Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192707›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2016

Plant-plant interactions mediate the plastic and genotypic response of Plantago asiatica to CO2: an experiment with plant populations from naturally high CO2 areas.

Marloes P van Loon, Max Rietkerk, Stefan C Dekker, Kouki Hikosaka, Miki U Ueda, Niels P R Anten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marloes P van LoonEcology and Biodiversity Group, Utrecht University, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands m.p.vanloon@uu.nl.
Max RietkerkDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable development, Utrecht University, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan C DekkerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable development, Utrecht University, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kouki HikosakaGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.
Miki U UedaGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.
Niels P R AntenCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe rising atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) is a ubiquitous selective force that may strongly impact species distribution and vegetation functioning. Plant-plant interactions could mediate the trajectory of vegetation responses to elevated [CO2], because some plants may benefit more from [CO2] elevation than others. The relative contribution of plastic (within the plant's lifetime) and genotypic (over several generations) responses to elevated [CO2] on plant performance was investigated and how these patterns are modified by plant-plant interactions was analysed.

methodsPlantago asiatica seeds originating from natural CO2 springs and from ambient [CO2] sites were grown in mono stands of each one of the two origins as well as mixtures of both origins. In total, 1944 plants were grown in [CO2]-controlled walk-in climate rooms, under a [CO2] of 270, 450 and 750 ppm. A model was used for upscaling from leaf to whole-plant photosynthesis and for quantifying the influence of plastic and genotypic responses. KEY

resultsIt was shown that changes in canopy photosynthesis, specific leaf area (SLA) and stomatal conductance in response to changes in growth [CO2] were mainly determined by plastic and not by genotypic responses. We further found that plants originating from high [CO2] habitats performed better in terms of whole-plant photosynthesis, biomass and leaf area, than those from ambient [CO2] habitats at elevated [CO2] only when both genotypes competed. Similarly, plants from ambient [CO2] habitats performed better at low [CO2], also only when both genotypes competed. No difference in performance was found in mono stands.

conclusionThe results indicate that natural selection under increasing [CO2] will be mainly driven by competitive interactions. This supports the notion that plant-plant interactions have an important influence on future vegetation functioning and species distribution. Furthermore, plant performance was mainly driven by plastic and not by genotypic responses to changes in atmospheric [CO2].

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideGenotypeJapanModels, BiologicalPhotosynthesisPlantagoPlant LeavesCarbon DioxideCanopy functioningclimate changecompetitionelevated CO2evolutionary responsegame theorygenotypic responsenaturally high CO2Plantago asiatica L.plant–plant interactionsplastic responseselection pressure

Identifiers

PMID27192707
PMCPMC4904180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.