Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192501›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Diffusion-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Semiautomated Voxel Selection Technique Improves Interreader Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.

Habib Rahbar, Brenda F Kurland, Matthew L Olson, Averi E Kitsch, John R Scheel, Xiaoyu Chai, Joshua Usoro, Constance D Lehman, Savannah C Partridge

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Utility of Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Decrease Unnecessary Biopsies Prompted by Breast MRI: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (A6702).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Is NME the enemy of breast DWI?European journal of radiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. DWI in the Assessment of Breast Lesions.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Habib RahbarFrom the *Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; †Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Brenda F Kurland
Matthew L Olson
Averi E Kitsch
John R Scheel
Xiaoyu Chai
Joshua Usoro
Constance D Lehman
Savannah C Partridge

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Detection and Characterization of Breast LesionsR01CA151326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether a semiautomated voxel selection technique improves interreader reproducibility for breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements.

methodsThree readers retrospectively performed ADC measurements of 31 breast lesions (16 malignant, 15 benign) and contralateral normal tissue in 26 women both unassisted (manual method) and assisted by a semiautomated software tool that excludes voxels below a dynamically specified signal intensity threshold. Reproducibility between readers for each technique was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs).

resultsDifferences between readers' measured ADCs of lesions were smaller with the semiautomated tool vs the manual method. Concordance correlation coefficients for each reader pair were greater with the semiautomated tool for lesions (mean CCC difference, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.26). For normal tissue, reader agreement was lower than for lesions and did not differ based on software tools (mean CCC difference, 0.00; 95% confidence interval, -0.14 to 0.13).

conclusionsA semiautomated voxel selection tool can improve interreader reproducibility of breast lesion ADC measures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMiddle AgedObserver VariationPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27192501
PMCPMC4874523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.