Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192491›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Prescribing of Antidiabetic Medicines before, during and after Pregnancy: A Study in Seven European Regions.

Rachel A Charlton, Kari Klungsøyr, Amanda J Neville, Sue Jordan, Anna Pierini, Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg, H Jens Bos, Aurora Puccini, Anders Engeland, Rosa Gini and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antidiabetic Therapy during Pregnancy: The Prescription Pattern in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Controversies in Gestational Diabetes.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Rachel A CharltonDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Kari KlungsøyrMedical Birth Registry, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Amanda J NevilleIMER (Emilia Romagna Registry of Birth Defects), Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Sue JordanDepartment of Nursing, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Anna PieriniInstitute of Clinical Physiology-National Research Council (IFC-CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Lolkje T W de Jong-van den BergPharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics unit, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H Jens BosPharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics unit, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Aurora PucciniDrug Policy Service, Emilia Romagna Region Health Authority, Bologna, Italy.
Anders EngelandDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rosa GiniAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, Florence, Italy.
Gareth DaviesCentre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Daniel ThayerCentre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Anne V HansenPaediatric department, Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark.
Margery MorganCARIS, The Congenital Anomaly Register for Wales, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Hao WangPharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics unit, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anita McGroganDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Anne-Marie Nybo AndersenSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helen DolkCentre for Maternal, Fetal and Infant Research, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Ester GarnePaediatric department, Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark.
Swansea University · GBUniversity of Groningen · NLLillebaelt Hospital · DKUniversity of Bath · GBAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITInfant · IENational Research Council · ITNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOSingleton Hospital · GBUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore antidiabetic medicine prescribing to women before, during and after pregnancy in different regions of Europe.

methodsA common protocol was implemented across seven databases in Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Italy (Emilia Romagna/Tuscany), Wales and the rest of the UK. Women with a pregnancy starting and ending between 2004 and 2010, (Denmark, 2004-2009; Norway, 2005-2010; Emilia Romagna, 2008-2010), which ended in a live or stillbirth, were identified. Prescriptions for antidiabetic medicines issued (UK) or dispensed (non-UK) during pregnancy and/or the year before or year after pregnancy were identified. Prescribing patterns were compared across databases and over calendar time.

results1,082,673 live/stillbirths were identified. Pregestational insulin prescribing during the year before pregnancy ranged from 0.27% (CI95 0.25-0.30) in Tuscany to 0.45% (CI95 0.43-0.47) in Norway, and increased between 2004 and 2009 in all countries. During pregnancy, insulin prescribing peaked during the third trimester and increased over time; third trimester prescribing was highest in Tuscany (2.2%) and lowest in Denmark (0.5%). Of those prescribed an insulin during pregnancy, between 50.5% in Denmark and 88.8% in the Netherlands received an insulin analogue alone or in combination with human insulin, this proportion increasing over time. Oral products were mainly metformin and prescribing was highest in the 3 months before pregnancy. Metformin use during pregnancy increased in some countries.

conclusionPregestational diabetes is increasing in many areas of Europe. There is considerable variation between and within countries in the choice of medication for treating pregestational diabetes in pregnancy, including choice of insulin analogues and oral antidiabetics, and very large variation in the treatment of gestational diabetes despite international guidelines.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysHypoglycemic AgentsAdultDatabases, FactualDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes MellitusDrug PrescriptionsEuropeFemaleHumansInsulinPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPrevalenceHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID27192491
PMCPMC4871589
OpenAlexW2403577301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.