Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192393›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2016

Scarlet Fever Upsurge in England and Molecular-Genetic Analysis in North-West London, 2014.

Claire E Turner, Marta Pyzio, Bonita Song, Theresa Lamagni, Margie Meltzer, J Yimmy Chow, Androulla Efstratiou, Sally Curtis, Shiranee Sriskandan

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Invasive group A Streptococcus infection (Streptococcus pyogenes): Current situation in Spain.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Emerging Invasive Group A Streptococcus M1Emerging infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes M1Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cryptic prophages within aMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Scarlet fever: a guide for general practitioners.London journal of primary care · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire E Turner
Marta Pyzio
Bonita Song
Theresa Lamagni
Margie Meltzer
J Yimmy Chow
Androulla Efstratiou
Sally Curtis
Shiranee Sriskandan

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scarlet fever notifications surged across the United Kingdom in spring 2014. Molecular epidemiologic investigation of Streptococcus pyogenes infections in North-West London highlighted increased emm4 and emm3 infections coincident with the upsurge. Unlike outbreaks in other countries, antimicrobial resistance was uncommon, highlighting an urgent need to better understand the drivers of scarlet fever activity.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialGenotypeHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLondonMutationScarlet FeverStreptococcus pyogenesSuperantigensAntigens, BacterialSuperantigensantimicrobial resistancebacteriaEnglandgenotypeLondonnotificationsrespiratory infectionsscarlet feverstreptococciStreptococcus pyogenessuperantigens

Identifiers

PMID27192393
PMCPMC4880090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.