Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192376›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2017

Opinion Leaders in Online Cancer Support Groups: An Investigation of Their Antecedents and Consequences.

Eunkyung Kim, Dietram A Scheufele, Jeong Yeob Han, Dhavan Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eunkyung Kima School of Journalism and Mass Communication , University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Dietram A Scheufeleb Department of Life Sciences Communication , University of Wisconsin-Madison, Morgridge Institute for Research.
Jeong Yeob Hanc Department of Advertising and Public Relations , Henry W. Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication.
Dhavan Shahd School of Journalism and Mass Communication , Center for Health Enhancement System Studies (CHESS), University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Using Technology to Enhance Cancer Communication and Improve Clinical OutcomesP50CA095817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2003 to 2012
$19.3M
Impact on opioid use of bundling medication-assisted treatment with mHealthR01DA040449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095817NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a focus on the nature and dynamic process of social interactions among breast cancer patients, this study argues that the notion of opinion leaders can be another crucial factor in explaining positive psychosocial health outcomes within computer-mediated social support (CMSS) groups. This study investigates the relationship between opinion leaders and their psychosocial health benefits by considering two overarching questions: (a) Who are the opinion leaders? (b) What role do these opinion leaders play in explaining health outcomes? The data analyzed in this study resulted from merging human-coded content analysis of discussion group messages, action log data analysis of interactive health system usage, and longitudinal survey data. Surveys were administered to 221 women with breast cancer; participants were provided free access to and training for the CMSS groups developed by the Comprehensive Health Support System (CHESS) project. The findings suggest that opinion leaders obtained psychosocial health benefits, such as higher levels of cancer information competence, breast cancer knowledge, and better problem-focused coping strategies. Those who had a higher baseline level of breast cancer knowledge and optimism in coping with challenges in their life were more likely to act as opinion leaders. Implications for research and improving psychosocial interventions for people with health concerns are discussed.

Indexed as

InternetLeadershipAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsConsumer Health InformationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedProblem SolvingQuality of LifeSelf-Help GroupsSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID27192376
PMCPMC5266618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.