Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192352›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2017

Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anees B Chagpar, Nina R Horowitz, Brigid K Killelea, Theodore Tsangaris, Peter Longley, Sonia Grizzle, Michael Loftus, Fangyong Li, Meghan Butler, Karen Stavris and 7 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anees B Chagpar*Department of Surgery, Yale University †Yale Cancer Center ‡Yale Center for Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research §Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University ¶Yale-New Haven Hospital ||Yale Center for Analytical Sciences **Department of Pathology, Yale University ††Department of Medicine, Yale University.
Nina R Horowitz
Brigid K Killelea
Theodore Tsangaris
Peter Longley
Sonia Grizzle
Michael Loftus
Fangyong Li
Meghan Butler
Karen Stavris
Xiaopan Yao
Malini Harigopal
Veerle Bossuyt
Donald R Lannin
Lajos Pusztai
Amy J Davidoff
Cary P Gross
Breast Cancer Research Foundation · US

Funding

Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS W BOSENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to compare costs associated with excision of routine cavity shave margins (CSM) versus standard partial mastectomy (PM) in patients with breast cancer.

backgroundExcision of CSM reduces re-excision rates by more than 50%. The economic implications of this is, however, unclear.

methodsBetween October 21, 2011 and November 25, 2013, 235 women undergoing PM for Stage 0-III breast cancer were randomized to undergo either standard PM ("no shave", n = 116) or have additional CSM taken ("shave", n = 119). Costs from both a payer and a hospital perspective were measured for index surgery and breast cancer surgery-related care through subsequent 90 days.

resultsThe 2 groups were well-matched in terms of baseline characteristics. Those in the "shave" group had a longer operative time at the initial surgery (median 76 vs 66 min, P < 0.01), but a lower re-excision rate for positive margins (13/119 = 10.9% vs 32/116 = 27.6%, P < 0.01). Actual direct hospital costs associated with operating room time ($1315 vs. $1137, P = 0.03) and pathology costs ($1195 vs $795, P < 0.01) were greater for the initial surgery in patients in the "shave" group. Taking into account the index surgery and the subsequent 90 days, there was no significant difference in cost from either the payer ($10,476 vs $11,219, P = 0.40) or hospital perspective ($5090 vs $5116, P = 0.37) between the "shave" and "no shave" groups.

conclusionsOverall costs were not significantly different between the "shave" and "no shave" groups due to significantly fewer reoperative surgeries in the former.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCarcinoma, LobularConnecticutFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth ExpendituresHospital CostsHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27192352
PMCPMC5605915
OpenAlexW2400480887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.