Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192170›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Low Mutation Burden in Ovarian Cancer May Limit the Utility of Neoantigen-Targeted Vaccines.

Spencer D Martin, Scott D Brown, Darin A Wick, Julie S Nielsen, David R Kroeger, Kwame Twumasi-Boateng, Robert A Holt, Brad H Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Spencer D MartinTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5914-0305
Scott D BrownMichael Smith's Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Darin A WickTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.
Julie S NielsenTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.
David R KroegerTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.
Kwame Twumasi-BoatengTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.
Robert A HoltMichael Smith's Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Brad H NelsonTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to advances in sequencing technology, somatically mutated cancer antigens, or neoantigens, are now readily identifiable and have become compelling targets for immunotherapy. In particular, neoantigen-targeted vaccines have shown promise in several pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, to date, neoantigen-targeted vaccine studies have involved tumors with exceptionally high mutation burdens. It remains unclear whether neoantigen-targeted vaccines will be broadly applicable to cancers with intermediate to low mutation burdens, such as ovarian cancer. To address this, we assessed whether a derivative of the murine ovarian tumor model ID8 could be targeted with neoantigen vaccines. We performed whole exome and transcriptome sequencing on ID8-G7 cells. We identified 92 somatic mutations, 39 of which were transcribed, missense mutations. For the 17 top predicted MHC class I binding mutations, we immunized mice subcutaneously with synthetic long peptide vaccines encoding the relevant mutation. Seven of 17 vaccines induced robust mutation-specific CD4 and/or CD8 T cell responses. However, none of the vaccines prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice in either the prophylactic or therapeutic setting. Moreover, none of the neoantigen-specific T cell lines recognized ID8-G7 tumor cells in vitro, indicating that the corresponding mutations did not give rise to bonafide MHC-presented epitopes. Additionally, bioinformatic analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data revealed that only 12% (26/220) of HGSC cases had a ≥90% likelihood of harboring at least one authentic, naturally processed and presented neoantigen versus 51% (80/158) of lung cancers. Our findings highlight the limitations of applying neoantigen-targeted vaccines to tumor types with intermediate/low mutation burdens.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorEpitopesFemaleImmunotherapyMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutation AccumulationOvarian NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID27192170
PMCPMC4871527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.