Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Predictive Factors of Spontaneous Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions among Community Pharmacists.

Yun Mi Yu, Euni Lee, Bon Sun Koo, Kyeong Hye Jeong, Kyung Hee Choi, Lee Kyung Kang, Mo Se Lee, Kwang Hoon Choi, Jung Mi Oh, Wan Gyoon Shin

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Why Pharmacovigilance of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs is Important in India?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reaction among health professionals in Ghana.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yun Mi YuCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Euni LeeCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Bon Sun KooCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyeong Hye JeongCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Hee ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Suncheon University, Suncheon, Joellanam-do, South Korea.
Lee Kyung KangCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Mo Se LeeRegional Pharmacovigilance Center, Korean Pharmaceutical Association, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwang Hoon ChoiRegional Pharmacovigilance Center, Korean Pharmaceutical Association, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Mi OhCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Wan Gyoon ShinCollege of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSuncheon Jeil College · KRChung-Ang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the association between spontaneous reporting (SR) and the knowledge, attitude, and needs of community pharmacists (CPs), using a questionnaire following a conceptual model known as the mixed model of knowledge-attitude-practices and the satisfaction of needs.

methodsSelf-administered questionnaires were used with a nationwide convenience sample of CPs between September 1, 2014 and November 25, 2014 in Korea. The association between SR and the predictive factors was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsIn total, 1,001 questionnaires were analyzed. The mean age of the respondents and the number of years spent in community pharmacy practice were 45.6 years and 15.3 years, respectively. CPs with experience of SR was 29.4%. Being older than 60 (ORadj, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.42), having prior experience with adverse drug reactions (ADR) (ORadj, 6.46; 95% CI, 2.46-16.98), having higher specific knowledge of SR (ORadj, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.96-6.56), and having less concern about the obstacles to SR (ORadj, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57) were significant contributing factors to SR. The main obstacles to SR included perception of ADRs as 'not serious ADR' (77.9%), 'already well known ADR' (81.5%), and 'uncertain about causality' (73.3%). CPs without reporting experience had greater concerns related to the reporting method and the liability of the pharmacy than those with reporting experience (p<0.05).

conclusionsFindings from our study showed around one in three CPs had ADR reporting experience in Korea, while 87.1% had prior experience with ADR cases. The knowledge of SR, prior experience of ADR, and less concern about the obstacles to SR were contributing factors for reporting levels.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmaciesPharmacistsPharmacovigilanceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27192159
PMCPMC4871451
OpenAlexW2403816244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.