Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27191838›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

Strategies for Developing and Recognizing Faculty Working in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.

David L Coleman, Richard M Wardrop, Wendy S Levinson, Mark L Zeidel, Polly E Parsons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Change Management in Medical Contexts, especially in Medical Education: A Systematized Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Building Psychiatric Quality Programs and Defining Quality Leadership Roles at Four Academic Medical Centers.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Inpatient Patient Safety Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David L ColemanD.L. Coleman is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. R.M. Wardrop III is associate professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. W.S. Levinson is professor, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M.L. Zeidel is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. P.E. Parsons is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Richard M Wardrop
Wendy S Levinson
Mark L Zeidel
Polly E Parsons
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic clinical departments have the opportunity and responsibility to improve the quality and value of care and patient safety by supporting effective quality improvement activities. The pressure to provide high-value care while further developing academic programs has increased the complexity of decision making and change management in academic health systems. Overcoming these challenges will require faculty engagement and leadership; however, most academic departments do not have a sufficient number of individuals with expertise and experience in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS). Accordingly, the authors of this article advocate for a targeted and proactive approach to developing faculty working in QI/PS. They propose a strategy predicated on the identification of QI/PS as a strategic priority for academic departments, the creation of enabling resources in QI/PS, and the expansion of rigorous training programs in change management and in improvement and implementation sciences. Professional organizations, health systems, medical schools, and academic departments should recognize successful QI/PS work with awards and promotions. Individual faculty members should expand their collaborative networks, consider the generalizability and scholarly impact of their efforts when designing QI/PS initiatives, and benchmark the outcomes of their performance. Appointments and promotions committees should work proactively with department and QI/PS leaders to ensure that outstanding achievement in QI/PS is defined and recognized. As with the development of physician-investigators and clinician-educators, departments and health systems need a comprehensive approach to support and recognize the contributions of faculty working in QI/PS to meet the considerable needs and opportunities in health care.

Indexed as

CurriculumCooperative BehaviorEducation, MedicalFaculty, MedicalHumansInternship and ResidencyLeadershipPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementStaff Development

Identifiers

PMID27191838
OpenAlexW2405639753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.