ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017
Strategies for Developing and Recognizing Faculty Working in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Advancing Professionalism Through a Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Workshop in Radiation Oncology.Cureus · 2025Article
- Experience of nurse-guided root cause analysis after a sentinel event: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Promoting scholarship in improvement science: A model for academic clinical departments.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Speaking up about patient safety concerns: view of nursing students.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Change Management in Medical Contexts, especially in Medical Education: A Systematized Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022Review
- Scholarship, teaching practice and educational responsibility: Issues in designing and implementing a quality improvement and evidence-based practice module in the undergraduate curriculum.Future healthcare journal · 2021Article
- Building Psychiatric Quality Programs and Defining Quality Leadership Roles at Four Academic Medical Centers.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2020Article
- Speaking up culture of medical students within an academic teaching hospital: Need of faculty working in patient safety.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Statewide Campus System Scholarly Activity Developmental Planning Framework for Community-Based GME Leaders.Spartan medical research journal · 2018Article
- An Inpatient Patient Safety Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018Article
- Mentoring Medical Students in Patient Safety and Quality Improvement: Exploring Faculty Confidence and Leadership.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Increasing Faculty Participation and Mentorship in Quality Improvement with an Experiential Four-Hour Workshop.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic clinical departments have the opportunity and responsibility to improve the quality and value of care and patient safety by supporting effective quality improvement activities. The pressure to provide high-value care while further developing academic programs has increased the complexity of decision making and change management in academic health systems. Overcoming these challenges will require faculty engagement and leadership; however, most academic departments do not have a sufficient number of individuals with expertise and experience in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS). Accordingly, the authors of this article advocate for a targeted and proactive approach to developing faculty working in QI/PS. They propose a strategy predicated on the identification of QI/PS as a strategic priority for academic departments, the creation of enabling resources in QI/PS, and the expansion of rigorous training programs in change management and in improvement and implementation sciences. Professional organizations, health systems, medical schools, and academic departments should recognize successful QI/PS work with awards and promotions. Individual faculty members should expand their collaborative networks, consider the generalizability and scholarly impact of their efforts when designing QI/PS initiatives, and benchmark the outcomes of their performance. Appointments and promotions committees should work proactively with department and QI/PS leaders to ensure that outstanding achievement in QI/PS is defined and recognized. As with the development of physician-investigators and clinician-educators, departments and health systems need a comprehensive approach to support and recognize the contributions of faculty working in QI/PS to meet the considerable needs and opportunities in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.