Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27191722›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Species Identification in Malaise Trap Samples by DNA Barcoding Based on NGS Technologies and a Scoring Matrix.

Jérôme Morinière, Bruno Cancian de Araujo, Athena Wai Lam, Axel Hausmann, Michael Balke, Stefan Schmidt, Lars Hendrich, Dieter Doczkal, Berthold Fartmann, Samuel Arvidsson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dataset of Grey plover (Biodiversity data journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jérôme MorinièreSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Bruno Cancian de AraujoSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Athena Wai LamSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7782-6041
Axel HausmannSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Michael BalkeSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Stefan SchmidtSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-8706
Lars HendrichSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Dieter DoczkalSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Berthold FartmannLGC Genomics GmbH, Ostendstraße 25, TGS Haus 8, 12459, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-9196
Samuel ArvidssonLGC Genomics GmbH, Ostendstraße 25, TGS Haus 8, 12459, Berlin, Germany.
Gerhard HaszprunarSNSB, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Barcoding initiatives BFB and GBOL have generated a reference library of more than 16,000 metazoan species, which is now ready for applications concerning next generation molecular biodiversity assessments. To streamline the barcoding process, we have developed a meta-barcoding pipeline: We pre-sorted a single malaise trap sample (obtained during one week in August 2014, southern Germany) into 12 arthropod orders and extracted DNA from pooled individuals of each order separately, in order to facilitate DNA extraction and avoid time consuming single specimen selection. Aliquots of each ordinal-level DNA extract were combined to roughly simulate a DNA extract from a non-sorted malaise sample. Each DNA extract was amplified using four primer sets targeting the CO1-5' fragment. The resulting PCR products (150-400bp) were sequenced separately on an Illumina Mi-SEQ platform, resulting in 1.5 million sequences and 5,500 clusters (coverage ≥10; CD-HIT-EST, 98%). Using a total of 120,000 DNA barcodes of identified, Central European Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera downloaded from BOLD we established a reference sequence database for a local CUSTOM BLAST. This allowed us to identify 529 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) from our sequence clusters derived from pooled Malaise trap samples. We introduce a scoring matrix based on the sequence match percentages of each amplicon in order to gain plausibility for each detected BIN, leading to 390 high score BINs in the sorted samples; whereas 268 of these high score BINs (69%) could be identified in the combined sample. The results indicate that a time consuming presorting process will yield approximately 30% more high score BINs compared to the non-sorted sample in our case. These promising results indicate that a fast, efficient and reliable analysis of next generation data from malaise trap samples can be achieved using this pipeline.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsArthropodsBiodiversityCluster AnalysisCytochromes cDatabases, Nucleic AcidGermanyInsectaWorkflowCytochromes c

Identifiers

PMID27191722
PMCPMC4871420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.