ArticleJAMA dermatology2016
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of dermatologic research excellence: an analysis of Stanford-Elsevier Lists of the top 2% scholars worldwide (2017-2023).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers to clinical cosmetic and laser dermatology research in the academic setting by source of funding: a systematic review.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
- Are females in classical hematology getting a fair share? Uncovering gender disparities in NIH R01 grants.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Dermatology Receives Fewer Grants Versus Other Specialties but Excels in Citation Impact in a Cross-sectional Analysis of R01 Grants 2000-2022.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- NIH research funding success in dermatology training programs, a cross-sectional analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Gender gaps in National Institutes of Health dermatology grant recipients.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021Article
- Article
- The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.Higher education · 2021Review
- Gender and race trends in academic rank of dermatologists at top U.S. institutions: A cross-sectional study.International journal of women's dermatology · 2020Article
- Gender differences in funding among grant recipients in emergency medicine: A multicenter analysis.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Diversification in the medical sciences fuels growth of physician-scientists.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019Article
- Gender Equity Improving among Award Winners and Leaders at the Society for Investigative Dermatology.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2019Article
- Gender Equity in Clinical Dermatology-Reason for Optimism.JAMA dermatology · 2019Article
- Gender differences in career development awards in United States' anesthesiology and surgery departments, 2006-2016.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Article
- Research on Skin Cancer-Related Behaviors and Outcomes in the NIH Grant Portfolio, 2000-2014: Skin Cancer Intervention Across the Cancer Control Continuum (SCI-3C).JAMA dermatology · 2017Article
- Disparities in Academic Dermatology.JAMA dermatology · 2016Article
- Women in Dermatology Leadership: Results from a Nationwide Survey.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceNational Institutes of Health (NIH) grants are becoming increasingly competitive in the academic research arena. Identifying NIH funding disparities is an important step in improving academic diversity.
objectiveTo examine recent NIH funding trends in dermatology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective study with linear regression analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance of all NIH grants awarded to departments of dermatology from fiscal year 2009 to 2014. Funding data were exported from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Publication data were drawn from Scopus. All NIH-funded principal investigators in dermatology were categorized by their academic degree and sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The NIH funding trends were compared by investigator degree (MD, PhD, or MD/PhD) and sex.
resultsA total of 1292 NIH-funded grants were awarded to dermatology research from fiscal year 2009 through 2014. Adjusted NIH funding for dermatologic research diminished by 4.6% from $67.3 million in 2009 to $64.2 million in 2014, with a nadir of $58.6 million in 2013. Funding for the NIH's Research Project Grant Program (R01) decreased by 21.0% from $43.9 million to $34.7 million during this period. The dollar amount of NIH funding significantly trended down for investigators with an MD degree by $1.35 million per year from $23.6 million in 2009 to $18.4 million in 2014 (P = .02) while there was no significant change in NIH funding for MD/PhD (from $17.6 million in 2009 to $19.8 million in 2014; P = .44) and PhD investigators (from $26.1 million in 2009 to $25.9 million in 2014; P = .74). Similarly, the total dollar amount of R01 grants awarded to principal investigators with only an MD degree trended down by $1.4 million per year from $13.2 million in 2009 to $6.0 million in 2014 (P < .001). The number of female investigators with NIH grants in dermatology trended down significantly compared with the trend of their male counterparts (from 49 women in 2009 to 43 women in 2014 vs from 84 men in 2009 to 97 men in 2014; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is a downward trend in NIH funding for female and MD-only dermatology investigators. Departmental support and junior faculty mentorship for women and MD investigators is crucial for maintaining their presence in NIH-funded dermatology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27191545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.