Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27191532›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2016

In Situ Transfection by Controlled Release of Lipoplexes Using Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.

Benjamin A Juliar, Melissa M Bromley, Alexander Moncion, Denise C Jones, Eric G O'Neill, Christopher G Wilson, Renny T Franceschi, Mario L Fabiilli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gas Embolization in a Rodent Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin A JuliarDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Melissa M BromleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Alexander MoncionDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Denise C JonesDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Eric G O'NeillDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Christopher G WilsonSchool of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Renny T FranceschiSchool of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Mario L FabiilliDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Controlled Vascularization Using Acoustic Droplet-Hydrogel CompositesR21AR065010 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FABIILLI, MARIO LEONARDO · 2014 to 2015
$347k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR065010NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Localized delivery of nucleic acids to target sites (e.g., diseased tissue) is critical for safe and efficacious gene therapy. An ultrasound-based technique termed acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) has been used to spatiotemporally control the release of therapeutic small molecules and proteins contained within sonosensitive emulsions. Here, ADV is used to control the release of lipoplex-containing plasmid DNA encoding an enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter-from a sonosensitive emulsion. Focused ultrasound (3.5 MHz, mechanical index (MI) ≥ 1.5) generates robust release of fluorescein (i.e., surrogate payload) and lipoplex from the emulsion. In situ release of the lipoplex from the emulsion using ADV (MI = 1.5, 30 cycles) yields a 55% release efficiency, resulting in 43% transfection efficiency and 95% viability with C3H/10T1/2 cells. Without exposure to ultrasound, the release and transfection efficiencies are 5% and 7%, respectively, with 99% viability. Lipoplex released by ADV retains its bioactivity while the ADV process does not yield any measureable sonoporative enhancement of transfection. Co-encapsulation of Ficoll PM 400 within the lipoplex-loaded emulsion, and its subsequent release using ADV, yield higher transfection efficiency than the lipoplex alone. The results demonstrate that ADV can have utility in the spatiotemporal control of gene delivery.

Indexed as

Ultrasonic WavesAnimalsCell LineCell SurvivalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMiceMultipotent Stem CellsPlasmidsTransfectionenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent Proteinsacoustic droplet vaporizationemulsiongene deliverylipoplexperfluorocarbonultrasound

Identifiers

PMID27191532
PMCPMC4956527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.