Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27191382›Full record

ArticleAging2016

Deep biomarkers of human aging: Application of deep neural networks to biomarker development.

Eugene Lane, Polina Mamoshina, Alexander Aliper, Mikhail Korzinkin, Alexey Moskalev, Alexey Kolosov, Alexander Ostrovskiy, Charles Cantor, Jan Vijg, Alex Zhavoronkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Change in the Rate of Biological Aging in Response to Caloric Restriction: CALERIE Biobank Analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blood biomarkers and breed genetics of aging in pet dogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Age Estimation From Blood Test Results Using a Random Forest Model.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eugene LanePharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Polina MamoshinaPharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Alexander AliperPharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Mikhail KorzinkinPharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Alexey MoskalevPharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Alexey KolosovInvitro Laboratory, Ltd, Moscow 125047, Russia.
Alexander OstrovskiyInvitro Laboratory, Ltd, Moscow 125047, Russia.
Charles CantorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Jan VijgDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Alex ZhavoronkovPharma.AI Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major impediments in human aging research is the absence of a comprehensive and actionable set of biomarkers that may be targeted and measured to track the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. In this study, we designed a modular ensemble of 21 deep neural networks (DNNs) of varying depth, structure and optimization to predict human chronological age using a basic blood test. To train the DNNs, we used over 60,000 samples from common blood biochemistry and cell count tests from routine health exams performed by a single laboratory and linked to chronological age and sex. The best performing DNN in the ensemble demonstrated 81.5 % epsilon-accuracy r = 0.90 with R(2) = 0.80 and MAE = 6.07 years in predicting chronological age within a 10 year frame, while the entire ensemble achieved 83.5% epsilon-accuracy r = 0.91 with R(2) = 0.82 and MAE = 5.55 years. The ensemble also identified the 5 most important markers for predicting human chronological age: albumin, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, urea and erythrocytes. To allow for public testing and evaluate real-life performance of the predictor, we developed an online system available at http://www.aging.ai. The ensemble approach may facilitate integration of multi-modal data linked to chronological age and sex that may lead to simple, minimally invasive, and affordable methods of tracking integrated biomarkers of aging in humans and performing cross-species feature importance analysis.

Indexed as

AgingAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersBlood GlucoseErythrocyte CountHumansModels, BiologicalNerve NetPhysical ExaminationSerum AlbuminUreaAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersBlood GlucoseSerum AlbuminUreaaging biomarkersbiomarker developmentdeep learningdeep neural networkshuman agingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID27191382
PMCPMC4931851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.