ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Evaluation of Protein Kinase Cβ and PPARγ Activity in Diabetic Rats Supplemented with Momordica charantia.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant-Based Diets and Phytochemicals in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Prevention of Its Complications: A Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Fifty Percent Ethanolic Extract ofReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe present study was taken up to compare and evaluate the effect of Momordica charantia supplementation with pioglitazone on PKC-β and PPAR-γ activity in kidneys of diabetic rats. The hypoglycaemic and lipid lowering effect of Momordica charantia were screened in laboratory animal model and its potency was compared with a Thiazolidinedione (TZD) group antidiabetic drug like pioglitazone. MATERIALS AND
methodsAdult healthy albino rats of Wistar strain aged 3-4months, weighing between 170-250gm of either sex were divided into 4 groups; Group 1 (normal controls), Group 2 (diabetic controls), Group 3 (diabetic rats treated with pioglitazone) and Group 4 (diabetic rats treated with bitter melon juice). Type 1 Diabetes was induced in rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin at a dose of 55 mg/kg body weight, following which glucose levels were estimated by Accu chek- active glucometer on day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days to assess the efficacy of Bitter Melon Juice (BMJ) and pioglitazone. After 28 days of treatment, the rats were sacrificed and blood collected from abdominal vena cava was used for estimation of triglycerides by Glycerol 3 phosphate oxidase phenol aminophenazone method and cholesterol by Cholestrol oxidase phenol aminophenazone method. PKC-β and PPAR-γ were estimated in the dissected kidneys by using double sandwich ELISA based kits on an automated plate reader.
resultsBMJ significantly reduced blood glucose levels in group 4 as compared to diabetic controls (p<0.001). Total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly reduced in both group 3 and 4. In Group 4, there was reduction in PKC-β levels, when compared to Group 3(p=0.004). PPAR-γ levels were increased in both Group 3 and 4, when compared to Group 2.
conclusionThe results suggest that BMJ has hypoglycaemic and lipid lowering effect in diabetic animal models. BMJ increases PPAR-γ activity and decreases PKC-β activity in kidneys of diabetic rats, thereby preventing the complications of diabetes mellitus. Fresh BMJ mimics action of pioglitazone belonging to TZD group thus showing a potential for further research in identifying the active molecules responsible for glucose and lipid lowering action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.