Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27190760›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2016

Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Joshua A Hirsch, Frank Je Falco, Mark V Boswell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03304730 (Prognostic Factors of Efficacy in Corticoid and Anesthetic Joint Infiltration for the Treatment of Patients with Low Back Pain Secondary to Zygapophyseal Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03304730 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic Factors of Efficacy in Corticoid and Anesthetic Joint Infiltration for the Treatment of Patients with Low Back Pain Secondary to Zygapophyseal Osteoarthritis: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinRan2017 to 2027Enrolled147ConditionsDegenerative Arthropathy of Lumbar Spinal Facet Joint
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Minimally invasive lumbar facet arthrodesis with the FFX® device: surgical anatomy, patient selection, and technique.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laxmaiah ManchikantiLaxmaiah Manchikanti, Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, United States.
Joshua A HirschLaxmaiah Manchikanti, Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, United States.
Frank Je FalcoLaxmaiah Manchikanti, Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, United States.
Mark V BoswellLaxmaiah Manchikanti, Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.

methodsThe review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodology of controlled trials of diagnostic validity and randomized controlled trials of therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion criteria encompassed all facet joint interventions performed in a controlled fashion. The pain relief of greater than 50% was the outcome measure for diagnostic accuracy assessment of the controlled studies with ability to perform previously painful movements, whereas, for randomized controlled therapeutic efficacy studies, the primary outcome was significant pain relief and the secondary outcome was a positive change in functional status. For the inclusion of the diagnostic controlled studies, all studies must have utilized either placebo controlled facet joint blocks or comparative local anesthetic blocks. In assessing therapeutic interventions, short-term and long-term reliefs were defined as either up to 6 mo or greater than 6 mo of relief. The literature search was extensive utilizing various types of electronic search media including PubMed from 1966 onwards, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, clinicaltrials.gov, along with other sources including previous systematic reviews, non-indexed journals, and abstracts until March 2015. Each manuscript included in the assessment was assessed for methodologic quality or risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist for diagnostic interventions, and Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for therapeutic interventions. Evidence based on the review of the systematic assessment of controlled studies was graded utilizing a modified schema of qualitative evidence with best evidence synthesis, variable from level I to level V.

resultsAcross all databases, 16 high quality diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. In addition, multiple studies assessed the influence of multiple factors on diagnostic validity. In contrast to diagnostic validity studies, therapeutic efficacy trials were limited to a total of 14 randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of intraarticular injections, facet or zygapophysial joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of the innervation of the facet joints. The evidence for the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with at least 75% pain relief with ability to perform previously painful movements was level I, based on a range of level I to V derived from a best evidence synthesis. For therapeutic interventions, the evidence was variable from level II to III, with level II evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy for long-term improvement (greater than 6 mo), and level III evidence for lumbosacral zygapophysial joint injections for short-term improvement only.

conclusionThis review provides significant evidence for the diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks, and moderate evidence for therapeutic radiofrequency neurotomy and therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain.

Indexed as

Chronic low back painControlled diagnostic blocksIntraarticular injectionsLumbar discogenic painLumbar facet jointLumbar facet joint nerve blocksLumbar facet joint painLumbar facet joint radiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID27190760
PMCPMC4865722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.