ArticlePeerJ2016
Optimisation of DNA extraction from the crustacean Daphnia.
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Novel DNA Adducts in Amphipods and Developing Sample Preparation for Adductomics Using Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Proteomic Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Perish the thawed? EDTA reduces DNA degradation during extraction from frozen tissue.PloS one · 2025Article
- Tissue-specific DNA isolation from dissected millipedes for nanopore sequencing.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Reducing DNA extraction costs through factorial design for the DNAdvance Kit.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Article
- Raman, TEM, EELS, and Magnetic Studies of a Magnetically Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanohybrid following Exposure toNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Best practices for generating and analyzing 16S rRNA amplicon data to track coral microbiome dynamics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- DNA/RNA Preservation in Glacial Snow and Ice Samples.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The Uptake of Sporopollenin Exine Capsules and Associated Bioavailability of Adsorbed Oestradiol in Selected Aquatic Invertebrates.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2021Article
- Targeted Manipulation of Abundant and Rare Taxa in themSystems · 2021Article
- Characterisation of the dynamic nature of lipids throughout the lifespan of genetically identical female and male Daphnia magna.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A comprehensive epigenomic analysis of phenotypically distinguishable, genetically identical female and male Daphnia pulex.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Optimization of high molecular weight DNA extraction methods in shrimp for a long-read sequencing platform.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis of eight DNA extraction methods for molecular research in mealybugs.PloS one · 2019Article
- Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Pattern of DNA Methylation in Daphnia: Evolutionary Perspective.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Use of 5-azacytidine in a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the impact of pre-natal and post-natal exposures, as well as within generation persistent DNA methylation changes in Daphnia.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Home-Made Cost Effective Preservation Buffer Is a Better Alternative to Commercial Preservation Methods for Microbiome Research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daphnia are key model organisms for mechanistic studies of phenotypic plasticity, adaptation and microevolution, which have led to an increasing demand for genomics resources. A key step in any genomics analysis, such as high-throughput sequencing, is the availability of sufficient and high quality DNA. Although commercial kits exist to extract genomic DNA from several species, preparation of high quality DNA from Daphnia spp. and other chitinous species can be challenging. Here, we optimise methods for tissue homogenisation, DNA extraction and quantification customised for different downstream analyses (e.g., LC-MS/MS, Hiseq, mate pair sequencing or Nanopore). We demonstrate that if Daphnia magna are homogenised as whole animals (including the carapace), absorbance-based DNA quantification methods significantly over-estimate the amount of DNA, resulting in using insufficient starting material for experiments, such as preparation of sequencing libraries. This is attributed to the high refractive index of chitin in Daphnia's carapace at 260 nm. Therefore, unless the carapace is removed by overnight proteinase digestion, the extracted DNA should be quantified with fluorescence-based methods. However, overnight proteinase digestion will result in partial fragmentation of DNA therefore the prepared DNA is not suitable for downstream methods that require high molecular weight DNA, such as PacBio, mate pair sequencing and Nanopore. In conclusion, we found that the MasterPure DNA purification kit, coupled with grinding of frozen tissue, is the best method for extraction of high molecular weight DNA as long as the extracted DNA is quantified with fluorescence-based methods. This method generated high yield and high molecular weight DNA (3.10 ± 0.63 ng/µg dry mass, fragments >60 kb), free of organic contaminants (phenol, chloroform) and is suitable for large number of downstream analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.