Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27190702›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Incorporation of an invasive plant into a native insect herbivore food web.

Menno Schilthuizen, Lúcia P Santos Pimenta, Youri Lammers, Peter J Steenbergen, Marco Flohil, Nils G P Beveridge, Pieter T van Duijn, Marjolein M Meulblok, Nils Sosef, Robin van de Ven and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bookkeeping of insect herbivory trends in herbarium specimens of purple loosestrife (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  7. Museum specimens provide novel insights into changing plant-herbivore interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Menno SchilthuizenEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Lúcia P Santos PimentaInstitute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Departamento de Química, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Youri LammersEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Peter J SteenbergenInstitute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Marco FlohilServiceXS , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Nils G P BeveridgeEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pieter T van DuijnEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marjolein M MeulblokEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nils SosefEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Robin van de VenEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ralf WerringEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Kevin K BeentjesBiodiversity Discovery group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Kim MeijerGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands.
Rutger A VosEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; IBED, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Klaas VrielingInstitute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Barbara GravendeelEndless Forms group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Young ChoiInstitute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Natural Products Laboratory, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Robert VerpoorteInstitute for Biology Leiden, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Chris SmitGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands.
Leo W BeukeboomGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLNaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Leiden · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLServiceXS (Netherlands) · NLUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of invasive species into native food webs represent multifarious dynamics of ecological and evolutionary processes. We document incorporation of Prunus serotina (black cherry) into native insect food webs. We find that P. serotina harbours a herbivore community less dense but more diverse than its native relative, P. padus (bird cherry), with similar proportions of specialists and generalists. While herbivory on P. padus remained stable over the past century, that on P. serotina gradually doubled. We show that P. serotina may have evolved changes in investment in cyanogenic glycosides compared with its native range. In the leaf beetle Gonioctena quinquepunctata, recently shifted from native Sorbus aucuparia to P. serotina, we find divergent host preferences on Sorbus- versus Prunus-derived populations, and weak host-specific differentiation among 380 individuals genotyped for 119 SNP loci. We conclude that evolutionary processes may generate a specialized herbivore community on an invasive plant, allowing prognoses of reduced invasiveness over time. On the basis of the results presented here, we would like to caution that manual control might have the adverse effect of a slowing down of processes of adaptation, and a delay in the decline of the invasive character of P. serotina.

Indexed as

AdaptationExotic plantsInsect herbivoresPrunus serotinaSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID27190702
PMCPMC4867706
OpenAlexW2309766839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.