Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27190583›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2016

Current adjuvant treatment modalities for gastric cancer: From history to the future.

Leyla Kilic, Cetin Ordu, Ibrahim Yildiz, Fatma Sen, Serkan Keskin, Rumeysa Ciftci, Kezban Nur Pilanci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Mutational separation and clinical outcomes ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes andCancer management and research · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The reactivation of P53 by saRNA affects the biological behavior in vitro in gastric cancer cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leyla KilicLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Cetin OrduLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Ibrahim YildizLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Fatma SenLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Serkan KeskinLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Rumeysa CiftciLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Kezban Nur PilanciLeyla Kilic, Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discrepancy between the surgical technique and the type of adjuvant chemotherapy used in clinical trials and patient outcomes in terms of overall survival rates has led to the generation of different adjuvant treatment protocols in distinct parts of the world. The adjuvant treatment recommendation is generally chemoradiotherapy in the United States, perioperative chemotherapy in the United Kingdom and parts of Europe, and chemotherapy in Asia. These options mainly rely on the United States Intergroup-0116, United Kingdom British Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy, and the Asian Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Adjuvant Study in Stomach Cancer trials. However, the benefits were evident for only certain patients, which were not very homogeneous regarding the type of surgery, chemotherapy regimens, and stage of disease. Whether the dissimilarities in survival are attributable to surgical technique or intrinsic biological differences is a subject of debate. Regardless of the extent of surgery, multimodal therapy may offer modest survival advantage at least for diseases with lymph node involvement. Moreover, in the era of individualized treatment for most of the other cancer types, identification of special subgroups comprising those who will derive more or no benefit from adjuvant therapy merits further investigation. The aim of this review is to reveal the historical evolution and future reflections of adjuvant treatment modalities for resected gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapyBiomarkerGastric cancerLymph nodes

Identifiers

PMID27190583
PMCPMC4865711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.