ReviewBiomicrofluidics2016
Advances in monoliths and related porous materials for microfluidics.
Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vertical-flow porous microchamber arrays for cell capture, intracellular molecule staining, and population analysis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Considerations for Method Development and Method Translation in Capillary Liquid Chromatography: A Tutorial.Journal of chromatography open · 2024Article
- Monolithic affinity columns in 3D printed microfluidics for chikungunya RNA detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Immunoaffinity monoliths for multiplexed extraction of preterm birth biomarkers from human blood serum in 3D printed microfluidic devices.The Analyst · 2022Article
- 3× multiplexed detection of antibiotic resistant plasmids with single molecule sensitivity.Lab on a chip · 2020Article
- A Visible-Light-Powered Polymerization Method for the Immobilization of Enantioselective Organocatalysts into Microreactors.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Article
- 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Solid-Phase Extraction and On-Chip Fluorescent Labeling of Preterm Birth Risk Biomarkers.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Tunable Polymeric Scaffolds for Enzyme Immobilization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- 3D printed microfluidic devices with immunoaffinity monoliths for extraction of preterm birth biomarkers.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Sequence-specific sepsis-related DNA capture and fluorescent labeling in monoliths prepared by single-step photopolymerization in microfluidic devices.Journal of chromatography. A · 2018Article
- Automated microfluidic devices integrating solid-phase extraction, fluorescent labeling, and microchip electrophoresis for preterm birth biomarker analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Bacterial Nanocellulose Loaded with Bromelain: Assessment of Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Physical-Chemical Properties.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Electrokinetically operated microfluidic devices for integrated immunoaffinity monolith extraction and electrophoretic separation of preterm birth biomarkers.The Analyst · 2017Article
- Sequence-specific DNA solid-phase extraction in an on-chip monolith: Towards detection of antibiotic resistance genes.Journal of chromatography. A · 2017Article
- Recent advances in microfluidic sample preparation and separation techniques for molecular biomarker analysis: A critical review.Analytica chimica acta · 2017Review
- Integrated electrokinetically driven microfluidic devices with pH-mediated solid-phase extraction coupled to microchip electrophoresis for preterm birth biomarkers.Electrophoresis · 2017Article
- On-Chip Fluorescent Labeling using Reversed-phase Monoliths and Microchip Electrophoretic Separations of Selected Preterm Birth Biomarkers.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2016Article
- Preface to Special Topic: Selected Papers from the 2015 Annual Meeting of the AES Electrophoresis Society in Salt Lake City, Utah.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the use of monolithic porous polymers has seen significant growth. These materials present a highly useful support for various analytical and biochemical applications. Since their introduction, various approaches have been introduced to produce monoliths in a broad range of materials. Simple preparation has enabled their easy implementation in microchannels, extending the range of applications where microfluidics can be successfully utilized. This review summarizes progress regarding monoliths and related porous materials in the field of microfluidics between 2010 and 2015. Recent developments in monolith preparation, solid-phase extraction, separations, and catalysis are critically discussed. Finally, a brief overview of the use of these porous materials for analysis of subcellular and larger structures is given.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.