Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27190529›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2016

Benefits of Whole-Body Vibration, as a Component of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation, in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review with a Suitable Approach.

Danubia Sá-Caputo, Cintia Renata Gonçalves, Danielle Soares Morel, Eloá Moreira Marconi, Patrícia Fróes, Rogério Rufino, Cláudia Henrique Costa, Agnaldo José Lopes, Adriano Arnóbio, Nasser Ribeiro Asad and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Clinical Approaches of Whole Body Vibration Exercises.Rehabilitation research and practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Danubia Sá-CaputoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Experimental, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cintia Renata GonçalvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Danielle Soares MorelPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Eloá Moreira MarconiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Experimental, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Patrícia FróesUniversidade Potiguar, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Rogério RufinoDepartamento de Especialidades Médicas (Pneumologia e Tisiologia), Faculdade de Ciências Medicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cláudia Henrique CostaDepartamento de Especialidades Médicas (Pneumologia e Tisiologia), Faculdade de Ciências Medicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Agnaldo José LopesDepartamento de Especialidades Médicas (Pneumologia e Tisiologia), Faculdade de Ciências Medicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Adriano ArnóbioPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Nasser Ribeiro AsadDepartamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Pedro Jesus MarinLaboratory of Physiology, European University Miguel de Cervantes, Valladolid, Spain; CYMO Research Institute, Valladolid, Spain; Departmento de Clínica Médica, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Trentham FurnessSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Mario Bernardo-FilhoDepartamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Appropriate management, including pulmonary rehabilitation, associated with correct diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients can contribute to improving clinical conditions of these patients. Physical activity is recommended for COPD patients. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a modality of physical activity. Putting together the biological effects and safe use of WBV, it may be a potentially feasible intervention to add to pulmonary rehabilitation. The purpose of this investigation was to systematically review studies regarding the effects of WBV, as a component of the pulmonary rehabilitation, in patients with COPD. Results. A total of six publications met inclusion for review. There was evidence to support the beneficial use of WBV to improve functional performance of the lower limbs and quality of life. However, the appropriateness of and descriptors of WBV methods were poorly described. Conclusions. The results of this review support the use of WBV as a component of pulmonary rehabilitation to assist management of patients with COPD. However, future research should examine the dose-response curve and optimal dosing regimen of WBV according to standard reporting recommendations for people with COPD. Such an approach will allow comparison among studies and the potential of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Identifiers

PMID27190529
PMCPMC4848410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.