Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189996›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Comparative Genomics of Two Closely Related Wolbachia with Different Reproductive Effects on Hosts.

Irene L G Newton, Michael E Clark, Bethany N Kent, Seth R Bordenstein, Jiaxin Qu, Stephen Richards, Yogeshwar D Kelkar, John H Werren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Discovery of a novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Two male-killingRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Genes · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Irene L G NewtonDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington irnewton@indiana.edu.
Michael E ClarkDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester.
Bethany N KentDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University.
Seth R BordensteinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University.
Jiaxin QuHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Stephen RichardsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Yogeshwar D KelkarDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester.
John H WerrenDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester.
University of Rochester · USVanderbilt University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBaylor Genetics · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Wolbachia Genes That Mediate Cytoplasmic IncompatibilityR21HD086833 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BORDENSTEIN, SETH R · 2016 to 2017
$432k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia pipientis are obligate intracellular bacteria commonly found in many arthropods. They can induce various reproductive alterations in hosts, including cytoplasmic incompatibility, male-killing, feminization, and parthenogenetic development, and can provide host protection against some viruses and other pathogens. Wolbachia differ from many other primary endosymbionts in arthropods because they undergo frequent horizontal transmission between hosts and are well known for an abundance of mobile elements and relatively high recombination rates. Here, we compare the genomes of two closely related Wolbachia (with 0.57% genome-wide synonymous divergence) that differ in their reproductive effects on hosts. wVitA induces a sperm-egg incompatibility (also known as cytoplasmic incompatibility) in the parasitoid insect Nasonia vitripennis, whereas wUni causes parthenogenetic development in a different parasitoid, Muscidifurax uniraptor Although these bacteria are closely related, the genomic comparison reveals rampant rearrangements, protein truncations (particularly in proteins predicted to be secreted), and elevated substitution rates. These changes occur predominantly in the wUni lineage, and may be due in part to adaptations by wUni to a new host environment, or its phenotypic shift to parthenogenesis induction. However, we conclude that the approximately 8-fold elevated synonymous substitution rate in wUni is due to a either an elevated mutation rate or a greater number of generations per year in wUni, which occurs in semitropical host species. We identify a set of genes whose loss or pseudogenization in the wUni lineage implicates them in the phenotypic shift from cytoplasmic incompatibility to parthenogenesis induction. Finally, comparison of these closely related strains allows us to determine the fine-scale mutation patterns in Wolbachia Although Wolbachia are AT rich, mutation probabilities estimated from 4-fold degenerate sites are not AT biased, and predict an equilibrium AT content much less biased than observed (57-50% AT predicted vs. 76% current content at degenerate sites genome wide). The contrast suggests selection for increased AT content within Wolbachia genomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropodsCytoplasmDrosophilaGenome, BacterialGenomicsHost SpecificityMaleMutationPhylogenyReproductionSelection, GeneticWolbachiaendosymbiontmutational biasreproductive manipulation

Identifiers

PMID27189996
PMCPMC4898810
OpenAlexW2345476689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.