ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016
Comparative Genomics of Two Closely Related Wolbachia with Different Reproductive Effects on Hosts.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genomic stability and differential expression of type V cif genes inISME communications · 2026Article
- Variable effects of transient Wolbachia infections on alphaviruses in Aedes aegypti.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Comprehensive identification of GASA genes in sunflower and expression profiling in response to drought.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Intra-lineage microevolution of Wolbachia leads to the emergence of new cytoplasmic incompatibility patterns.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Discovery of a novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Bacterial community and genome analysis of cytoplasmic incompatibility-inducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Two male-killingRoyal Society open science · 2024Article
- Two Complete Genomes of Male-Killing Wolbachia Infecting Ostrinia Moth Species Illuminate Their Evolutionary Dynamics and Association with Hosts.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- New insights into the genome and transmission of the microsporidian pathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Widespread phages of endosymbionts: Phage WO genomics and the proposed taxonomic classification of Symbioviridae.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Comparative Genomics Reveals Factors Associated with Phenotypic Expression of Wolbachia.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Living in the endosymbiotic world of Wolbachia: A centennial review.Cell host & microbe · 2021Review
- Shrinking of repeating unit length in leucine-rich repeats from double-stranded DNA viruses.Archives of virology · 2021Article
- Long-Read Assembly and Annotation of the Parasitoid WaspFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Parallel Sequencing of Wolbachia wCer2 from Donor and Novel Hosts Reveals Multiple Incompatibility Factors and Genome Stability after Host Transfers.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Genome Assembly of the A-Group Wolbachia in Nasonia oneida Using Linked-Reads Technology.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Wolbachia pipientis are obligate intracellular bacteria commonly found in many arthropods. They can induce various reproductive alterations in hosts, including cytoplasmic incompatibility, male-killing, feminization, and parthenogenetic development, and can provide host protection against some viruses and other pathogens. Wolbachia differ from many other primary endosymbionts in arthropods because they undergo frequent horizontal transmission between hosts and are well known for an abundance of mobile elements and relatively high recombination rates. Here, we compare the genomes of two closely related Wolbachia (with 0.57% genome-wide synonymous divergence) that differ in their reproductive effects on hosts. wVitA induces a sperm-egg incompatibility (also known as cytoplasmic incompatibility) in the parasitoid insect Nasonia vitripennis, whereas wUni causes parthenogenetic development in a different parasitoid, Muscidifurax uniraptor Although these bacteria are closely related, the genomic comparison reveals rampant rearrangements, protein truncations (particularly in proteins predicted to be secreted), and elevated substitution rates. These changes occur predominantly in the wUni lineage, and may be due in part to adaptations by wUni to a new host environment, or its phenotypic shift to parthenogenesis induction. However, we conclude that the approximately 8-fold elevated synonymous substitution rate in wUni is due to a either an elevated mutation rate or a greater number of generations per year in wUni, which occurs in semitropical host species. We identify a set of genes whose loss or pseudogenization in the wUni lineage implicates them in the phenotypic shift from cytoplasmic incompatibility to parthenogenesis induction. Finally, comparison of these closely related strains allows us to determine the fine-scale mutation patterns in Wolbachia Although Wolbachia are AT rich, mutation probabilities estimated from 4-fold degenerate sites are not AT biased, and predict an equilibrium AT content much less biased than observed (57-50% AT predicted vs. 76% current content at degenerate sites genome wide). The contrast suggests selection for increased AT content within Wolbachia genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.