Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189732›Full record

ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2016

Benign hepatocellular nodules of healthy liver: focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma.

Massimo Roncalli, Amedeo Sciarra, Luca Di Tommaso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnosis and Management of Benign Liver Tumors.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Senescence markers in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: pathogenic considerations on the basis of immunohistochemical results.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Alpha-fetoprotein and focal nodular hyperplasia: An unconventional couple.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Hepatocellular adenomas: recent updates.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Massimo RoncalliPathology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Amedeo SciarraPathology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Luca Di TommasoPathology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the progress of imaging techniques, benign hepatocellular nodules are increasingly discovered in the clinical practice. This group of lesions mostly arises in the context of a putatively normal healthy liver and includes either pseudotumoral and tumoral nodules. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma are prototypical examples of these two categories of nodules. In this review we aim to report the main pathological criteria of differential diagnosis between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma, which mainly rests upon morphological and phenotypical features. We also emphasize that for a correct diagnosis the clinical context such as sex, age, assumption of oral contraceptives, associated metabolic or vascular disturbances is of paramount importance. While focal nodular hyperplasia is a single entity epidemiologically more frequent than adenoma, the latter is representative of a more heterogeneous group which has been recently and extensively characterized from a clinical, morphological, phenotypical and molecular profile. The use of the liver biopsy in addition to imaging and the clinical context are important diagnostic tools of these lesions. In this review we will survey their systematic pathobiology and propose a diagnostic algorithm helpful to increase the diagnostic accuracy of not dedicated liver pathologists. The differential diagnosis between so-called typical and atypical adenoma and well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Adenomabeta CateninCarcinoma, HepatocellularDiagnosis, DifferentialFocal Nodular HyperplasiaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHumansLiverLiver Neoplasmsbeta CateninHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaDifferential diagnosisFocal nodular hyperplasiaHepatocellular adenomaHepatocellular carcinomaLiver biopsy

Identifiers

PMID27189732
PMCPMC4946404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.