Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189607›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

Argo: enabling the development of bespoke workflows and services for disease annotation.

Riza Batista-Navarro, Jacob Carter, Sophia Ananiadou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Thalia: semantic search engine for biomedical abstracts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in Text Mining and Visualization for Precision Medicine.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2018
    Article
  8. iTextMine: integrated text-mining system for large-scale knowledge extraction from the literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  9. Overview of the interactive task in BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  10. Text mining resources for the life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Review
  11. BioCreative V BioC track overview: collaborative biocurator assistant task for BioGRID.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riza Batista-NavarroNational Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK riza.batista@manchester.ac.uk.
Jacob CarterNational Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sophia AnaniadouNational Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M006891/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Argo (http://argo.nactem.ac.uk) is a generic text mining workbench that can cater to a variety of use cases, including the semi-automatic annotation of literature. It enables its technical users to build their own customised text mining solutions by providing a wide array of interoperable and configurable elementary components that can be seamlessly integrated into processing workflows. With Argo's graphical annotation interface, domain experts can then make use of the workflows' automatically generated output to curate information of interest.With the continuously rising need to understand the aetiology of diseases as well as the demand for their informed diagnosis and personalised treatment, the curation of disease-relevant information from medical and clinical documents has become an indispensable scientific activity. In the Fifth BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop (BioCreative V), there was substantial interest in the mining of literature for disease-relevant information. Apart from a panel discussion focussed on disease annotations, the chemical-disease relations (CDR) track was also organised to foster the sharing and advancement of disease annotation tools and resources.This article presents the application of Argo's capabilities to the literature-based annotation of diseases. As part of our participation in BioCreative V's User Interactive Track (IAT), we demonstrated and evaluated Argo's suitability to the semi-automatic curation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes. Furthermore, the workbench facilitated the development of some of the CDR track's top-performing web services for normalising disease mentions against the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) database. In this work, we highlight Argo's support for developing various types of bespoke workflows ranging from ones which enabled us to easily incorporate information from various databases, to those which train and apply machine learning-based concept recognition models, through to user-interactive ones which allow human curators to manually provide their corrections to automatically generated annotations. Our participation in the BioCreative V challenges shows Argo's potential as an enabling technology for curating disease and phenotypic information from literature.Database URL: http://argo.nactem.ac.uk.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceComputational BiologyData MiningDiseaseHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID27189607
PMCPMC4869796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.