ArticleEuropean radiology2016
Magnetic resonance angiography of fetal vasculature at 3.0 T.
Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Article
- Fetal brain MR angiography at 1.5 T: a feasible study.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in human placenta: insights into fetal growth restriction and congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Placental volume in pregnant women with opioid use: prenatal MRI assessment.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2023Article
- Fetal-placental MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3 T.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of a Cross-Sectional Area of the Fetal Straight Sinus by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Clinical Value.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2022Review
- QUEST MRI assessment of fetal brain oxidative stress in utero.NeuroImage · 2019Article
- A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2018Article
- Quantitative Flow Imaging in Human Umbilical Vessels In Utero Using Nongated 2D Phase Contrast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Article
- Fetal neuroimaging: an update on technical advances and clinical findings.Pediatric radiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance angiography has not been used much previously for visualizing fetal vessels in utero for reasons that include a contraindication for the use of exogenous contrast agents, maternal respiratory motion and fetal motion. In this work, we report the feasibility of using an appropriately modified clinical time-of-flight magnetic resonance imaging sequence for non-contrast angiography of human fetal and placental vessels at 3.0 T. Using this 2D angiography technique, it is possible to visualize fetal vascular networks in late pregnancy. KEY POINTS: • 3D-visualization of fetal vasculature is feasible using non-contrast MRA at 3.0 T. • Visualization of placental vasculature is also possible with this method. • Fetal MRA can serve as a vascular localizer for quantitative MRI studies. • This method can be extended to 1.5 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.