Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189446›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2018

To spray or not to spray? Understanding participation in an indoor residual spray campaign in Arequipa, Peru.

Valerie A Paz-Soldán, Karin M Bauer, Gabrielle C Hunter, Ricardo Castillo-Neyra, Vanessa D Arriola, Daniel Rivera-Lanas, Geoffrey H Rodriguez, Amparo M Toledo Vizcarra, Lina M Mollesaca Riveros, Michael Z Levy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling the impact of xenointoxication in dogs to haltmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valerie A Paz-Soldána Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences , Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine , New Orleans , LA , USA.
Karin M Bauera Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences , Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine , New Orleans , LA , USA.
Gabrielle C Hunterc Department of Health, Behavior and Society , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Ricardo Castillo-Neyrad Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Vanessa D Arriolaf Department of Epidemiology , Tulane University , New Orleans , LA , USA.
Daniel Rivera-Lanasd Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Geoffrey H Rodriguezd Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Amparo M Toledo Vizcarraf Department of Epidemiology , Tulane University , New Orleans , LA , USA.
Lina M Mollesaca Riverosf Department of Epidemiology , Tulane University , New Orleans , LA , USA.
Michael Z Levyd Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Alison M Buttenheimg Department of Family and Community Health , University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing , Philadelphia , PA , USA.

Funding

Improving participation in vector control campaigns R01HD075869 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUTTENHEIM, ALISON MEREDITH, LEVY, MICHAEL Z · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Examining Human Behavior in Dengue Prevention Efforts in Iquitos, PeruK01TW008414 · FIC · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI PAZ-SOLDAN, VALERIE ANDREA · 2010 to 2013
$412k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW008414NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current low participation rates in vector control programmes in Arequipa, Peru complicate the control of Chagas disease. Using focus groups (n = 17 participants) and semi-structured interviews (n = 71) conducted in March and May 2013, respectively, we examined barriers to and motivators of household participation in an indoor residual spray (IRS) campaign that had taken place one year prior in Arequipa. The most common reported barriers to participation were inconvenient spray times due to work obligations, not considering the campaign to be necessary, concerns about secondary health impacts (e.g. allergic reactions to insecticides), and difficulties preparing the home for spraying (e.g. moving heavy furniture). There was also a low perception of risk for contracting Chagas disease that might affect participation. The main motivator to participate was to ensure personal health and well-being. Future IRS campaigns should incorporate more flexible hours, including weekends; provide appropriate educational messages to counter concerns about secondary health effects; incorporate peer educators to increase perceived risk to Chagas in community; obtain support from community members and leaders to build community trust and support for the campaign; and assist individuals in preparing their homes. Enhancing community trust in both the need for the campaign and its operations is key.

Indexed as

HousingInsecticidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChagas DiseaseCommunity ParticipationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPeruInsecticidesChagas diseasecommunity participationdeveloping countryIRSvector control

Identifiers

PMID27189446
PMCPMC5491364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.