Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189208›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016

Small area-level variation in the incidence of psychotic disorders in an urban area in France: an ecological study.

Andrei Szoke, Baptiste Pignon, Grégoire Baudin, Andrea Tortelli, Jean-Romain Richard, Marion Leboyer, Franck Schürhoff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Urbanicity and psychotic disorders: Facts and hypotheses.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrei SzokeINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France. andrei.szoke@inserm.fr.
Baptiste PignonINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.
Grégoire BaudinINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.
Andrea TortelliINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.
Jean-Romain RichardINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.
Marion LeboyerINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.
Franck SchürhoffINSERM, U955, Equipe 15, 94000, Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to determine whether significant variation in the incidence of clinically relevant psychoses existed at an ecological level in an urban French setting, and to examine possible factors associated with this variation. We aimed to advance the literature by testing this hypothesis in a novel population setting and by comparing a variety of spatial models.

methodsWe sought to identify all first episode cases of non-affective and affective psychotic disorders presenting in a defined urban catchment area over a 4 years period, over more than half a million person-years at-risk. Because data from geographic close neighbourhoods usually show spatial autocorrelation, we used for our analyses Bayesian modelling. We included small area neighbourhood measures of deprivation, migrants' density and social fragmentation as putative explanatory variables in the models.

resultsIncidence of broad psychotic disorders shows spatial patterning with the best fit for models that included both strong autocorrelation between neighbouring areas and weak autocorrelation between areas further apart. Affective psychotic disorders showed similar spatial patterning and were associated with the proportion of migrants/foreigners in the area (inverse correlation). In contrast, non-affective psychoses did not show spatial patterning.

conclusionsAt ecological level, the variation in the number of cases and the factors that influence this variation are different for non-affective and affective psychotic disorders. Important differences in results-compared with previous studies in different settings-point to the importance of the context and the necessity of further studies to understand these differences.

Indexed as

Small-Area AnalysisSocial EnvironmentAdolescentAdultAffective Disorders, PsychoticBayes TheoremCatchment Area, HealthEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersResidence CharacteristicsEcological studyPsychotic disordersRisk factorsSchizophreniaSpatial epidemiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.