Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189191›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2016

Dietary patterns in the French adult population: a study from the second French national cross-sectional dietary survey (INCA2) (2006-2007).

R Gazan, C Béchaux, A Crépet, V Sirot, P Drouillet-Pinard, C Dubuisson, S Havard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R GazanRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
C BéchauxRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
A CrépetRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
V SirotRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
P Drouillet-PinardRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
C DubuissonRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.
S HavardRisk Assessment Department,French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES),94701 Maisons-Alfort,France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and characterisation of dietary patterns are needed to define public health policies to promote better food behaviours. The aim of this study was to identify the major dietary patterns in the French adult population and to determine their main demographic, socio-economic, nutritional and environmental characteristics. Dietary patterns were defined from food consumption data collected in the second French national cross-sectional dietary survey (2006-2007). Non-negative-matrix factorisation method, followed by a cluster analysis, was implemented to derive the dietary patterns. Logistic regressions were then used to determine their main demographic and socio-economic characteristics. Finally, nutritional profiles and contaminant exposure levels of dietary patterns were compared using ANOVA. Seven dietary patterns, with specific food consumption behaviours, were identified: 'Small eater', 'Health conscious', 'Mediterranean', 'Sweet and processed', 'Traditional', 'Snacker' and 'Basic consumer'. For instance, the Health-conscious pattern was characterised by a high consumption of low-fat and light products. Individuals belonging to this pattern were likely to be older and to have a better nutritional profile than the overall population, but were more exposed to many contaminants. Conversely, individuals of Snacker pattern were likely to be younger, consumed more highly processed foods, had a nutrient-poor profile but were exposed to a limited number of food contaminants. The study identified main dietary patterns in the French adult population with distinct food behaviours and specific demographic, socio-economic, nutritional and environmental features. Paradoxically, for better dietary patterns, potential health risks cannot be ruled out. Therefore, this study demonstrated the need to conduct a risk-benefit analysis to define efficient public health policies regarding diet.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiet SurveysFemaleFranceHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsCS consumption systemDDS dietary diversity scoreDemographic and socio-economic determinantsDietary patternsED energy densityFood contaminant exposureINCA2 Second French National Dietary survey (2006–2007)MAR mean adequacy ratioNMF non-negative matrix factorisationNutritional intakesTEI total energy intake

Identifiers

PMID27189191
PMCPMC4910537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.