Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189071›Full record

Trial reportCerebellum (London, England)2017

Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to the Right Cerebellar Hemisphere Affects Motor Adaptation During Gait.

Lara Fernandez, Natalia Albein-Urios, Melissa Kirkovski, Jennifer L McGinley, Anna T Murphy, Christian Hyde, Mark A Stokes, Nicole J Rinehart, Peter G Enticott

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara FernandezSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Natalia Albein-UriosSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Melissa KirkovskiSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Jennifer L McGinleyPhysiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Anna T MurphyKingston Centre, Monash Health, Cheltenham, Victoria, 3192, Australia.
Christian HydeSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Mark A StokesSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Nicole J RinehartSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Peter G EnticottSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia. peter.enticott@deakin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum appears to play a key role in the development of internal rules that allow fast, predictive adjustments to novel stimuli. This is crucial for adaptive motor processes, such as those involved in walking, where cerebellar dysfunction has been found to increase variability in gait parameters. Motor adaptation is a process that results in a progressive reduction in errors as movements are adjusted to meet demands, and within the cerebellum, this seems to be localised primarily within the right hemisphere. To examine the role of the right cerebellar hemisphere in adaptive gait, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was administered to the right cerebellar hemisphere of 14 healthy adults in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Adaptation to a series of distinct spatial and temporal templates was assessed across tDCS condition via a pressure-sensitive gait mat (ProtoKinetics Zeno walkway), on which participants walked with an induced 'limp' at a non-preferred pace. Variability was assessed across key spatial-temporal gait parameters. It was hypothesised that cathodal tDCS to the right cerebellar hemisphere would disrupt adaptation to the templates, reflected in a failure to reduce variability following stimulation. In partial support, adaptation was disrupted following tDCS on one of the four spatial-temporal templates used. However, there was no evidence for general effects on either the spatial or temporal domain. This suggests, under specific conditions, a coupling of spatial and temporal processing in the right cerebellar hemisphere and highlights the potential importance of task complexity in cerebellar function.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebellumCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFatigueFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsAdaptationCerebellumGaitTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.