Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27189028›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Perfusion Pressure Cerebral Infarct (PPCI) trial - the importance of mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass to prevent cerebral complications after cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Anne G Vedel, Frederik Holmgaard, Lars Simon Rasmussen, Olaf B Paulson, Carsten Thomsen, Else Rubæk Danielsen, Annika Langkilde, Jens P Goetze, Theis Lange, Hanne Berg Ravn and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02185885 (The Importance of Mean Arterial Pressure During Cardiopulmonary Bypass to Prevent Cerebral Complications After Cardiac Surgery - a Randomised Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02185885 nacompletednot on this map

The Importance of Mean Arterial Pressure During Cardiopulmonary Bypass to Prevent Cerebral Complications After Cardiac Surgery - a Randomised Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2014 to 2016Enrolled197ConditionsEmbolic Stroke, Postoperative Cognitive DysfunctionArmsIncreased bloodpressure during CPB.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Preliminary Study on the Siphon Mechanism in Giraffe (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Pancreatic damage in COVID-19: Why? How?International journal of clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne G VedelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. ppci@vedel.dk.
Frederik HolmgaardDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Simon RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olaf B PaulsonNeurobiology Research Unit, Neuroscience Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten ThomsenDepartment of Radiology, Diagnostic Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Else Rubæk DanielsenDepartment of Radiology, Diagnostic Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annika LangkildeDepartment of Radiology, Diagnostic Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens P GoetzeDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Diagnostic Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theis LangeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne Berg RavnDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens C NilssonDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDebilitating brain injury occurs in 1.6-5 % of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported stroke-like lesions in up to 51 % of patients after cardiac surgery. The majority of the lesions seem to be caused by emboli, but inadequate blood flow caused by other mechanisms may increase ischaemia in the penumbra or cause watershed infarcts. During cardiopulmonary bypass, blood pressure can be below the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation. Although much debated, the constant blood flow provided by the cardiopulmonary bypass system is still considered by many as appropriate to avoid cerebral ischaemia despite the low blood pressure. METHODS/

designThe Perfusion Pressure Cerebral Infarct trial is a single-centre superiority trial with a blinded outcome assessment. The trial is randomising 210 patients with coronary vessel and/or valve disease and who are undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients are stratified by age and surgical procedure and are randomised 1:1 to either an increased mean arterial pressure (70-80 mmHg) or 'usual practice' (40-50 mmHg) during cardiopulmonary bypass. The cardiopulmonary bypass pump flow is fixed and set at 2.4 L/minute/m(2) body surface area plus 10-20 % in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the volume of the new ischaemic cerebral lesions (in mL), expressed as the difference between a baseline, diffusion-weighted, magnetic resonance imaging scan and an equal scan conducted 3-6 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are the total number of new ischaemic cerebral lesions, postoperative cognitive dysfunction at discharge and 3 months postoperatively, diffuse cerebral injury evaluated by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and selected biochemical markers of cerebral injury. The sample size will enable us to detect a 50 % reduction in the primary outcome measure in the intervention compared to the control group at a significance level of 0.05 and with a power of 0.80. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical randomised study to evaluate whether the mean arterial pressure level during cardiopulmonary bypass influences the development of brain injuries that are detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02185885 . Registered on 7 July 2014.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureCardiac Surgical ProceduresCerebrovascular CirculationAdolescentAdultAgedCardiopulmonary BypassCerebral InfarctionClinical ProtocolsCognition DisordersDenmarkDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHomeostasisHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyCardiac anaesthesiaCardiopulmonary bypass surgeryEmbolic strokeIschaemic strokePostoperative cognitive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID27189028
PMCPMC4869311
OpenAlexW2405848809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.