Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27188959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Glycans affect DNA extraction and induce substantial differences in gut metagenomic studies.

Emmanouil Angelakis, Dipankar Bachar, Bernard Henrissat, Fabrice Armougom, Gilles Audoly, Jean-Christophe Lagier, Catherine Robert, Didier Raoult

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ethanol-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanouil AngelakisURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Dipankar BacharURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Bernard HenrissatCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7257, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Fabrice ArmougomURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Gilles AudolyURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Jean-Christophe LagierURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Catherine RobertURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Didier RaoultURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix Marseille Université,13005 Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exopolysaccharides produced by bacterial species and present in feces are extremely inhibitory to DNA restriction and can cause discrepancies in metagenomic studies. We determined the effects of different DNA extraction methods on the apparent composition of the gut microbiota using Illumina MiSeq deep sequencing technology. DNA was extracted from the stool from an obese female using 10 different methods and the choice of DNA extraction method affected the proportional abundance at the phylum level, species richness (Chao index, 227 to 2,714) and diversity (non parametric Shannon, 1.37 to 4.4). Moreover DNA was extracted from stools obtained from 83 different individuals by the fastest extraction assay and by an extraction assay that degradated exopolysaccharides. The fastest extraction method was able to detect 68% to 100% genera and 42% to 95% species whereas the glycan degradation extraction method was able to detect 56% to 93% genera and 25% to 87% species. To allow a good liberation of DNA from exopolysaccharides commonly presented in stools, we recommend the mechanical lysis of stools plus glycan degradation, used here for the first time. Caution must be taken in the interpretation of current metagenomic studies, as the efficiency of DNA extraction varies widely among stool samples.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsBacteriaDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKwashiorkorObesityPolysaccharidesPolysaccharides, BacterialProtein-Energy MalnutritionDNA, BacterialPolysaccharidesPolysaccharides, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID27188959
PMCPMC4870698
OpenAlexW2400777527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.