Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27188847›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic films during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT).

Filipa Costa, Sandra Sarmento, Dora Gomes, Helena Magalhães, Rosário Arrais, Graciete Moreira, Maria Fátima Cruz, José Pedro Silva, Lúcio Santos, Olga Sousa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filipa Costa1 Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Sandra Sarmento1 Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Dora Gomes3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Helena Magalhães3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Rosário Arrais3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Graciete Moreira4 UCA, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Maria Fátima Cruz4 UCA, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
José Pedro Silva5 Surgical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Lúcio Santos5 Surgical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Olga Sousa3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTIPO Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize in vivo dose distributions during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) for rectal cancer and to assess the alterations introduced by irregular irradiation surfaces in the presence of bevelled applicators.

methodsIn vivo measurements were performed with Gafchromic films during 32 IOERT procedures. 1 film per procedure was used for the first 20 procedures. The methodology was then optimized for the remaining 12 procedures by using a set of 3 films. Both the average dose and two-dimensional dose distributions for each film were determined. Phantom measurements were performed for comparison.

resultsFor flat and concave surfaces, the doses measured in vivo agree with expected values. For concave surfaces with step-like irregularities, measured doses tend to be higher than expected doses. Results obtained with three films per procedure show a large variability along the irradiated surface, with important differences from expected profiles. These results are consistent with the presence of surface hotspots, such as those observed in phantoms in the presence of step-like irregularities, as well as fluid build-up.

conclusionClinical dose distributions in the IOERT of rectal cancer are often different from the references used for prescription. Further studies are necessary to assess the impact of these differences on treatment outcomes. In vivo measurements are important, but need to be accompanied by accurate imaging of positioning and irradiated surfaces. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: These results confirm that surface irregularities occur frequently in rectal cancer IOERT and have a measurable effect on the dose distribution.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyElectronsFilm DosimetryHumansIntraoperative PeriodIn Vivo DosimetryPelvisPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27188847
PMCPMC5257329
OpenAlexW2406607253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.