ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016
Imaging follow-up after liver transplantation.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic value of ultrasound viscoelastic imaging for biliary and vascular complications after liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- All About Multiparametric MRI Evaluation in Biliary Tree Complications After Liver Transplant.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving the radiological diagnosis of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: Current approaches and future challenges.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
- European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (1) pre-transplant evaluation.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Biliary complications after liver transplantation: A computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging pictorial review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with abnormal liver function tests in the emergency department.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Early and Late Complications of Pediatric Liver Transplantation with Multi-slice Computed Tomography: A High-Volume Transplant Single-Center Study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Imaging findings of en bloc simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Review
- Algorithmic Approach to Deranged Liver Functions After Transplantation.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) represents the best treatment for end-stage chronic liver disease, acute liver failure and early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiologists should be aware of surgical techniques to distinguish a normal appearance from pathological findings. Imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, CT and MR, provide for rapid and reliable detection of vascular and biliary complications after LT. The role of imaging in the evaluation of rejection and primary graft dysfunction is less defined. This article illustrates the main surgical anastomoses during LT, the normal appearance and complications of the liver parenchyma and vascular and biliary structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.