Trial reportJournal of the American College of Surgeons2016
A Prognostic Model of Surgical Site Infection Using Daily Clinical Wound Assessment.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Methods for Diagnostic and Decision-Making Assistance in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic evaluation of machine learning models for postoperative surgical site infection prediction.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Technological Advances in Clinical Definition and Surveillance Methodology for Surgical Site Infection Incorporating Surgical Site Imaging and Patient-Generated Health Data.Surgical infections · 2019Pooled it
- Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review.F1000Research · 2019Pooled it
- Explainable Machine Learning Predictive Models for Surgical Site Infections: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Predictors of surgical site infections following cesarean delivery in public hospitals of West Ethiopia: A cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Semi-automated surveillance of surgical site infections using machine learning and rule-based classification models.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Enhanced Surveillance for Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Colon Surgery: Model Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Advancing infection prevention and control through artificial intelligence: a scoping review of applications, barriers, and a decision-support checklist.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
- Development of a knowledge-based healthcare-associated infections surveillance system in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Time to development of surgical site infection and its predictors among general surgery patients admitted at specialized hospitals in Amhara region, northwest Ethiopia: a prospective follow-up study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Data-Driven Technologies as Enablers for Value Creation in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: a Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Review
- The detection and prediction of surgical site infections using multi-modal sensors and machine learning: Results in an animal model.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Article
- Performance of machine learning algorithms for surgical site infection case detection and prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- Stratification of Length of Stay Prediction following Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients Using Artificial Intelligence; the Leeds L-AI-OS Score.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Challenges of Modeling Outcomes for Surgical Infections: A Word of Caution.Surgical infections · 2021Article
- Impact of bodyweight-adjusted antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical-site infection rates.BJS open · 2021Observational
- A Roadmap for Automatic Surgical Site Infection Detection and Evaluation Using User-Generated Incision Images.Surgical infections · 2019Review
- Validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire for assessment of surgical-site infection in closed primary wounds after hospital discharge.The British journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Wound Photography for Remote Postoperative Assessment of Surgical Site Infections.JAMA surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) remains a common, costly, and morbid health care-associated infection. Early detection can improve outcomes, yet previous risk models consider only baseline risk factors (BF) not incorporating a proximate and timely data source-the wound itself. We hypothesize that incorporation of daily wound assessment improves the accuracy of SSI identification compared with traditional BF alone. STUDY
designA prospective cohort of 1,000 post open abdominal surgery patients at an academic teaching hospital were examined daily for serial features (SF), for example, wound characteristics and vital signs, in addition to standard BF, for example, wound class. Using supervised machine learning, we trained 3 Naïve Bayes classifiers (BF, SF, and BF+SF) using patient data from 1 to 5 days before diagnosis to classify SSI on the following day. For comparison, we also created a simplified SF model that used logistic regression. Control patients without SSI were matched on 5 similar consecutive postoperative days to avoid confounding by length of stay. Accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated on a training and hold-out testing set.
resultsOf 851 patients, 19.4% had inpatient SSIs. Univariate analysis showed differences in C-reactive protein, surgery duration, and contamination, but no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, diabetes, or emergency surgery. The BF, SF, and BF+SF classifiers had area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.67, 0.76, and 0.76, respectively. The best-performing classifier (SF) had optimal sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.64, positive predictive value of 0.35, and negative predictive value of 0.93. Features most associated with subsequent SSI diagnosis were granulation degree, exudate amount, nasogastric tube presence, and heart rate.
conclusionsSerial features provided moderate positive predictive value and high negative predictive value for early identification of SSI. Addition of baseline risk factors did not improve identification. Features of evolving wound infection are discernable before the day of diagnosis, based primarily on visual inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.