ReviewFolia microbiologica2016
Biogenesis of antibiotics-viewing its history and glimpses of the future.
Review in Folia microbiologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nature's Arsenal: Uncovering Antibacterial Agents Against Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Redefining development inmBio · 2024Article
- Fish Skin Mucus Extracts: An Underexplored Source of Antimicrobial Agents.Marine drugs · 2023Review
- Status and Future Scope of Soft Nanoparticles-Based Hydrogel in Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Composites Based on Gellan Gum, Alginate and Nisin-Enriched Lipid Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Infected Wounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Antibiotics: Conventional Therapy and Natural Compounds with Antibacterial Activity-A Pharmaco-Toxicological Screening.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Determination and Identification of Antibiotic Drugs and Bacterial Strains in Biological Samples.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Antibiotic drug discovery.Microbial biotechnology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims at comparing some historical data with the current situation in the study of biogenesis of natural compounds, antibiotics in the first place. Biogenesis of tetracyclines and cycloheximide and related compounds serves as example. Examples of molecular biological and bioinformatics methods used in the study of antibiotic biogenesis are described both in terms of its historical aspects and the current knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27188629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.