Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27188460›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2016

Predicting Unprotected Sex and Unplanned Pregnancy among Urban African-American Adolescent Girls Using the Theory of Gender and Power.

Janet E Rosenbaum, Jonathan Zenilman, Eve Rose, Gina Wingood, Ralph DiClemente

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janet E RosenbaumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA. janet@post.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-513X
Jonathan ZenilmanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eve RoseBehavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gina WingoodBehavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ralph DiClementeBehavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

MARYLAND POPULATION RESEARCH CENTERR24HD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RENDALL, MICHAEL S. · 2001 to 2016
$6.6M
Johns Hopkins Training Program In STIsT32AI050056 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELLEN, JONATHAN M. · 2001 to 2015
$3.4M
REDUCING HIV RISK IN FEMALE TEENS: A TAILORED APPROACHR01MH061210 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DICLEMENTE, RALPH J · 1999 to 2004
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI050056NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041041NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive coercion has been hypothesized as a cause of unprotected sex and unplanned pregnancies, but research has focused on a narrow set of potential sources of reproductive coercion. We identified and evaluated eight potential sources of reproductive coercion from the Theory of Gender and Power including economic inequality between adolescent girls and their boyfriends, cohabitation, and age differences. The sample comprised sexually active African-American female adolescents, ages 15-21. At baseline (n = 715), 6 months (n = 607), and 12 months (n = 605), participants completed a 40-min interview and were tested for semen Y-chromosome with polymerase chain reaction from a self-administered vaginal swab. We predicted unprotected sex and pregnancy using multivariate regression controlling for demographics, economic factors, relationship attributes, and intervention status using a Poisson working model. Factors associated with unprotected sex included cohabitation (incidence risk ratio (IRR) 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (1.22, 1.81)), physical abuse (IRR 1.55 (1.21, 2.00)), emotional abuse (IRR 1.31 (1.06, 1.63)), and having a boyfriend as a primary source of spending money (IRR 1.18 (1.00, 1.39)). Factors associated with unplanned pregnancy 6 months later included being at least 4 years younger than the boyfriend (IRR 1.68 (1.14, 2.49)) and cohabitation (2.19 (1.35, 3.56)). Among minors, cohabitation predicted even larger risks of unprotected sex (IRR 1.93 (1.23, 3.03)) and unplanned pregnancy (3.84 (1.47, 10.0)). Adolescent cohabitation is a marker for unprotected sex and unplanned pregnancy, especially among minors. Cohabitation may have stemmed from greater commitment, but the shortage of affordable housing in urban areas could induce women to stay in relationships for housing. Pregnancy prevention interventions should attempt to delay cohabitation until adulthood and help cohabiting adolescents to find affordable housing.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedPsychological TheoryUnsafe SexUrban PopulationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorBlack or African AmericanFemaleForecastingHumansInterviews as TopicIntimate Partner ViolencePregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited StatesAdolescentsCondomsIntimate partner violenceSafe sexUnplanned pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27188460
PMCPMC4899331
OpenAlexW2395924673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.