ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2016
Self-weighing behavior in individuals with eating disorders.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Heart Rate Variability and Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa Spectrum Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Why are so many individuals with bulimia nervosa low in weight suppression?Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring occupation in recovery from bulimia nervosa: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2022Article
- Habits and attitudes about eating and self-weighing among adults who are recovered, recovering, or partially recovered from eating disorders: an open-ended survey study.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Article
- Self-weighing among young adults: who weighs themselves and for whom does weighing affect mood? A cross-sectional study of a population-based sample.Journal of eating disorders · 2021Article
- Article
- Eating pathology and psychological outcomes in young adults in self-regulation interventions using daily self-weighing.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019Article
- Relation of self-weighing to future weight gain and onset of disordered eating symptoms.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the frequency of self-weighing and reactions to prescribed weekly weighing among individuals with eating disorder (ED) diagnoses, and to compare individuals weighing more or less frequently on mass index (BMI) and the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) subscales.
methodBaseline EDE and demographics from five studies (N = 758).
resultsSelf-weighing was most frequent among individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), followed by those with bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). On average, participants reacted moderately negative to prescribed weekly weighing. No relationship between weighing frequency and BMI was evident in any sample. There was indication of greater pathology (i.e., restraint, shape concern, weight concern, global) in AN with more frequent weighing. In BN, mixed evidence emerged to support a relationship between more frequent weighing and higher shape concern, weight concern, and global score. In BED, higher restraint was found in those who weighed versus those who did not. DISCUSSION: Weighing frequency in each eating disorder (ED) sample was to some extent associated with greater ED severity, but not BMI. Future research should examine relationships between self-weighing, reactions to changing weighing frequency, and ED symptomatology in both ED and non-ED groups to understand the impact of self-weighing in heterogeneous populations. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:817-821).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.