Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27188274›Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2016

Adoptive immunotherapy against ovarian cancer.

Gloria Mittica, Sonia Capellero, Sofia Genta, Celeste Cagnazzo, Massimo Aglietta, Dario Sangiolo, Giorgio Valabrega

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advances in the treatment of malignant ascites in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Are We Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Is there a role for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer?Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gloria MitticaCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Sonia CapelleroDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Sofia GentaCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Celeste CagnazzoDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Massimo AgliettaCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Dario SangioloCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Giorgio ValabregaCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. giorgio.valabrega@ircc.it.
University of Turin · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard front-line therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is combination of debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the majority of patients experience disease recurrence. Although extensive efforts to find new therapeutic options, cancer cells invariably develop drug resistance and disease progression. New therapeutic strategies are needed to improve prognosis of patients with advanced EOC.Recently, several preclinical and clinical studies investigated feasibility and activity of adoptive immunotherapy in EOC. Our aim is to highlight prospective of adoptive immunotherapy in EOC, focusing on HLA-restricted Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), and MHC-independent immune effectors such as natural killer (NK), and cytokine-induced killer (CIK). Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown activity in several pre-clinical models. Available preclinical and clinical data suggest that adoptive cell therapy may provide the best benefit in settings of low tumor burden, minimal residual disease, or maintenance therapy. Further studies are needed to better define the optimal clinical setting.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHLA AntigensHumansImmune SystemLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingLymphocyte SubsetsOvarian NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeHLA AntigensAdoptive-cell therapyCIKLAKNKOvarian CancerTILs

Identifiers

PMID27188274
PMCPMC4869278
OpenAlexW2396404964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.