Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27188209›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2016

Assessment of the priority target group of mental health service networks within a nation-wide reform of adult psychiatry in Belgium.

Vincent Lorant, Adeline Grard, Chantal Van Audenhove, Eva Helmer, Joke Vanderhaegen, Pablo Nicaise

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Networks for healthcare delivery: a systematic literature review.Journal of health organization and management · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, B1.30.15, Clos Chapelle-Aux-Champs, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
Adeline GrardInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, B1.30.15, Clos Chapelle-Aux-Champs, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
Chantal Van AudenhoveLUCAS (Centre for Care Research and Consultancy), Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, postbus 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Eva HelmerLUCAS (Centre for Care Research and Consultancy), Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, postbus 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Joke VanderhaegenLUCAS (Centre for Care Research and Consultancy), Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, postbus 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, B1.30.15, Clos Chapelle-Aux-Champs, Brussels, 1200, Belgium. pablo.nicaise@uclouvain.be.
UCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBelgium is currently implementing a nation-wide reform of mental health care delivery based on service networks. These networks are supposed to strengthen the community-based supply of care, reduce the resort to hospitals, and improve the continuity of care. They are also intended to supply comprehensive care to all adult mental health users. It is unclear, however, if one single model of network can target the needs of the whole adult population with mental health problems.

methodsIn 2011, ten networks were commissioned and assessed. Networks included a total of 635 services of different types. Services were asked to select 10 users by systematic sampling and to state whether these users were considered as a priority for care in the network. Sociodemographic, social integration level, diagnoses, and psycho-social functioning variables were also collected.

resultsTwo thousand four hundred ninety users were included, and 1564 were given priority for network care. Priority was higher for men than for women (69.9 % versus 56.2 %), and for non-nationals than for Belgians (72.6 % versus 61.9 %). Users were designated priority when they had poor psycho-social functioning (HoNOS > 17, OR = 3.15, p < 0.001), personality disorder or schizophrenia (OR = 1.54, p < 0.001), and a medium level of social integration (SIX = [2,3], OR = 1.57, p < 0.001). Less socially integrated patients (SIX < 1, OR = 0.53, p < 0.001) and users of community and social services were less likely to be selected.

conclusionAlthough the reform was intended for the whole population of adults with mental health problems, the users selected have a profile of severe mentally-ill users with social deprivation and poor social functioning. Policy may have been over-ambitious trying to address the whole population with one single type of service network. The actual selection process of users makes it less likely that the reform will achieve all its objectives.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesAdultBelgiumFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care ReformHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsMental health care reformMental health policyMental health servicesOrganisational model

Identifiers

PMID27188209
PMCPMC4869276
OpenAlexW2399775764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.