Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27187233›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2016

Cognitive and oculomotor performance in subjects with low and high schizotypy: implications for translational drug development studies.

I Koychev, D Joyce, E Barkus, U Ettinger, A Schmechtig, C T Dourish, G R Dawson, K J Craig, J F W Deakin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

I KoychevDepartment of Community-Based Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, School of Community-Based Medicine, Manchester, UK.
D JoyceCognition, Schizophrenia and Imaging Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Denmark Hill, London.
E BarkusDepartment of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
U EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A SchmechtigDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
C T DourishP1vital, Wallingford, UK.
G R DawsonP1vital, Wallingford, UK.
K J CraigP1vital, Wallingford, UK.
J F W DeakinDepartment of Community-Based Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, School of Community-Based Medicine, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of drugs to improve cognition in patients with schizophrenia is a major unmet clinical need. A number of promising compounds failed in recent clinical trials, a pattern linked to poor translation between preclinical and clinical stages of drug development. Seeking proof of efficacy in early Phase 1 studies in surrogate patient populations (for example, high schizotypy individuals where subtle cognitive impairment is present) has been suggested as a strategy to reduce attrition in the later stages of drug development. However, there is little agreement regarding the pattern of distribution of schizotypal features in the general population, creating uncertainty regarding the optimal control group that should be included in prospective trials. We aimed to address this question by comparing the performance of groups derived from the general population with low, average and high schizotypy scores over a range of cognitive and oculomotor tasks. We found that tasks dependent on frontal inhibitory mechanisms (N-Back working memory and anti-saccade oculomotor tasks), as well as a smooth-pursuit oculomotor task were sensitive to differences in the schizotypy phenotype. In these tasks the cognitive performance of 'low schizotypes' was significantly different from 'high schizotypes' with 'average schizotypes' having an intermediate performance. These results indicate that for evaluating putative cognition enhancers for treating schizophrenia in early-drug development studies the maximum schizotypy effect would be achieved using a design that compares low and high schizotypes.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyCognitive DysfunctionDrug DiscoveryEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansMaleNootropic AgentsSchizophreniaTranslational Research, BiomedicalNootropic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27187233
PMCPMC5070057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.