Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27187161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Methylmercury Concentration in Fish and Risk-Benefit Assessment of Fish Intake among Pregnant versus Infertile Women in Taiwan.

Hsing-Cheng Hsi, You-Wen Hsu, Tien-Chin Chang, Ling-Chu Chien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development of a nutrition screening tool to identify need for dietetic intervention in female infertility.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Exposure Assessment of methyl mercury from consumption of fish and seafood in Peninsular Malaysia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Potential ofNutrients · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hsing-Cheng HsiGraduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
You-Wen HsuInstitute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tien-Chin ChangInstitute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ling-Chu ChienSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taipei University of Technology · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations in fish, the daily MeHg exposure dose, and the risk-benefit of MeHg, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (ω-3 PUFA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) related to fish intake among pregnant and infertile women in Taiwan. The measured MeHg concentrations in fish did not exceed the Codex guideline level of 1 mg/kg. Swordfish (0.28 ± 0.23 mg/kg) and tuna (0.14 ± 0.13 mg/kg) had the highest MeHg concentrations. The MeHg concentration in the hair of infertile women (1.82 ± 0.14 mg/kg) was significantly greater than that of pregnant women (1.24 ± 0.18 mg/kg). In addition, 80% of infertile women and 68% of pregnant women had MeHg concentrations in hair that exceeded the USEPA reference dose (1 mg/kg). The MeHg concentrations in hair were significantly and positively correlated with the estimated daily MeHg exposure dose. Based on the risk-benefit evaluation results, this paper recommends consumption of fish species with a low MeHg concentration and high concentrations of DHA + EPA and ω-3 PUFA (e.g., salmon, mackerel, and greater amberjack).

Indexed as

FishesFood ContaminationInfertility, FemaleSeafoodAdultAnimalsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleHairHumansMaternal ExposureMethylmercury CompoundsPregnancyRisk AssessmentDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3Methylmercury Compounds

Identifiers

PMID27187161
PMCPMC4871344
OpenAlexW2406621998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.