Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27186425›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2016

The life and works of S100P - from conception to cancer.

Filip Prica, Tomasz Radon, Yuzhu Cheng, Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RBMS1 Coordinates with the mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MicroRNA-495: a therapeutic and diagnostic tumor marker.Journal of molecular histology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filip PricaCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London London, UK.
Tomasz RadonCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London London, UK.
Yuzhu ChengInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University Newcastle, UK.
Tatjana Crnogorac-JurcevicCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700089Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its discovery in 1992, the small, 10.4 kDa calcium-binding protein S100P has gained the attention of researchers from different scientific fields due to its potential roles in both healthy and neoplastic tissues. Although not ubiquitously expressed, in tissues where it is present, S100P is associated with distinct changes in cellular behaviour. In this review we have summarized the evolutionary history of S100P, its expression and involvement in implantation and human embryonic development, as well as important functions in normal tissue and cancer. Finally, we have demonstrated its pivotal role as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target, which opens promising avenues for further fruitful research on S100P.

Indexed as

cancerembryonic developmentS100P

Identifiers

PMID27186425
PMCPMC4859681
OpenAlexW2473709326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.