Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27186407›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2016

The increased excretion of urinary orosomucoid 1 as a useful biomarker for bladder cancer.

Fei Li, Zhe Yu, Pengliang Chen, Guangzheng Lin, Tieqiu Li, Lina Hou, Yuejun Du, Wanlong Tan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Screening and verification of genes related to polycystic ovary syndrome.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fei LiDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Zhe YuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Pengliang ChenDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Guangzheng LinDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Tieqiu LiDepartment of Urology, Mawangdui Hospital of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Research Institute of Geriatrics Changsha 410016, Hunan, P. R. China.
Lina HouDepartment of Healthy Management, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Yuejun DuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Wanlong TanDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Southern Medical University · CNHunan Mawangdui Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the early detection rate and prediction of bladder cancer remains a great challenge in management of this disease. To examine the value of urinary orosomucoid 1 (ORM1) for the early detection and surveillance of bladder cancer, two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOFMS) were applied to identify the differently expressed proteins in urine between bladder cancer and healthy controls. Thirteen different proteins including ORM1 were identified. After verification by western blotting, the ORM1 expressions were quantified in 186 urine samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) correcting for creatinine expression. ELISA quantification showed the urinary ORM1-Cr was found to be higher in bladder cancer patients compared to controls and benign cases (7172.23±3049.67 versus 2243.16±969.01, 2493.48±830.37 ng/ml, respectively, P<0.0001). Furthermore, the pearson correlation analysis indicated that urinary ORM1 had high positive correlation with the pathology classification of bladder cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the cut-off value for early diagnosis of bladder cancer, and rendered an optimum cut-off value of 3912.97 ng/mg corresponding to 91.96% sensitivity and 94.34% specificity. Moreover, a cut-off value with 7351.28 ng/mg was utilized to distinguish infiltrating urothelial carcinoma from bladder cancer patients corresponding to 91.89% sensitivity and 90.67% specificity. In conclusion, our findings suggested the elevated urinary ORM1 could be a useful biomarker for bladder cancer. Further research is warranted to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of elevated ORM1.

Indexed as

bladder cancerdiagnosisexcretionOrosomucoid 1urine

Identifiers

PMID27186407
PMCPMC4859664
OpenAlexW2432737184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.