Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27186188›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2016

Usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers in discriminating between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in hospitalized children from a population with low vaccination coverage.

Ewelina Gowin, Jacek Wysocki, Dirk Avonts, Danuta Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska, Michal Michalak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Management of Acute Bacterial Meningitis in Children.Infection and drug resistance · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pleocytosis is not fully responsible for low CSF glucose in meningitis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewelina GowinDepartment of Family Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Jacek WysockiDepartment of Health Promotion, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Dirk AvontsFamily Medicine Department, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Danuta Januszkiewicz-LewandowskaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Department of Medical Diagnostic, Poznan, Poland.
Michal MichalakDepartment of Biostatistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most frequent pathogens responsible for meningitis beyond the neonatal period. Aseptic meningitis is a disabling condition, but bacterial meningitis if left untreated is 100% fatal. The aim of the study was to analyze the usefulness of biochemical and hematological parameters in distinguishing between bacterial and non-bacterial meningitis in children with meningitis from a population with low rates of vaccination against S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study is a retrospective chart review of children hospitalized with meningitis. In patients with aseptic and bacterial meningitis the following parameters were compared: C-reactive protein, D-dimers, fibrinogen, glucose level, and leukocyte level, and in cerebrospinal fluid, protein, glucose, and leukocyte concentrations were analyzed. Number of points in the Bacterial Meningitis Score (BMS) was calculated. The predictive value of each parameter to distinguish between bacterial and aseptic meningitis was evaluated.

resultsIn total, 129 patients were included in the study: 65 diagnosed with bacterial meningitis and 64 with aseptic meningitis. Bacterial and aseptic meningitis were statistically significantly different based on each analyzed parameter (p < 0.000001). Among children with aseptic meningitis 42 (66%) scored 0 points in the BMS, while all the children with bacterial meningitis had at least one point.

conclusionsIn children with meningitis inflammatory biomarkers differ statistically significantly depending on the etiology - bacterial or aseptic. Serum concentration of C-reactive protein higher than 80 mg/dl is a useful marker of bacterial etiology of meningitis. A high Bacterial Meningitis Score is indicative for bacterial meningitis.

Indexed as

aseptic meningitisbacterial meningitisC-reactive proteinneuroinfection

Identifiers

PMID27186188
PMCPMC4848372
OpenAlexW2398953144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.