Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27186066›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Hiatal Hernia Repair with Novel Biological Graft Reinforcement.

Kent C Sasse, David L Warner, Ellen Ackerman, Jared Brandt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Urinary Bladder Matrix Reinforcement for Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  10. Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair With Urinary Bladder Matrix Graft.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Observational
  11. Laparoscopic Rectopexy with Urinary Bladder Xenograft Reinforcement.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kent C SasseUniversity of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
David L WarnerUniversity of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Ellen AckermanUniversity of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Jared BrandtUniversity of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHiatal hernias are repaired laparoscopically with increasing use of reinforcement material. Both synthetic and biologically derived materials reduce the recurrence rate compared to primary crural repair. Synthetic mesh introduces complications, such as mesh erosion, fibrosis, and infection. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) represents a biologically derived material for use in hiatal hernia repair reinforcement with the potential to improve durability of repair without incurring the risks of other reinforcement materials.

methodsThe 15 cases presented involved hiatal hernia repair with primary crural repair with UBM reinforcement and fundoplication. Patients were followed for an average of 3 years, and were assessed with upper gastrointestinal (GI) series, endoscopy, and assessments of subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

resultsHernia diameters averaged 6 cm. Each repair was successful and completed laparoscopically. UBM exhibited favorable handling characteristics when placed as a horseshoe-type graft sutured to the crura. One patient underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation of a mild postoperative stenosis that resolved. No other complications occurred. In more than 3 years of follow-up, there have been no recurrences or long-term complications. GERD-health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores averaged 6 (range, 0-12, of a possible 50), indicating little reflux symptomatology. Follow-up upper GI series were obtained in 9 cases and showed intact repairs. An upper endoscopy was performed in 8 patients and showed no recurrences.

conclusionSurgeons may safely use laparoscopic fundoplication with UBM reinforcement for successful repair of hiatal hernias. In this series, repairs with UBM grafts have been durable at 3 years of follow-up and may serve as an alternative to synthetic mesh reinforcement of hiatal hernia repairs.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisSurgical MeshAdultAgedFemaleFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRecurrenceHiatal herniaUpper GI surgeryUrinary bladder matrix

Identifiers

PMID27186066
PMCPMC4854610
OpenAlexW2401346008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.