Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185911›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Empirical redefinition of comprehensive health and well-being in the older adults of the United States.

Martha K McClintock, William Dale, Edward O Laumann, Linda Waite

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06842459 (Prevention of Functional Decline by Multimodal Intervention in Older Patients With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06842459 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Functional Decline by Multimodal Intervention in Older Patients With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2025 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsDiabetes, Older PeopleArmsGeriatric Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Analyzing Birth Cohorts With the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Social Health in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha K McClintockDepartments of Psychology and Comparative Human Development and the Institute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; mkm1@uchicago.edu.
William DaleSection of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Edward O LaumannDepartment of Sociology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; NORC, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Linda WaiteDepartment of Sociology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; NORC, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Anaylsis of Wave 1 and Wave 2R37AG030481 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI WAITE, LINDA J · 2008 to 2017
$15.4M
National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (RMI)R01AG021487 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI WAITE, LINDA J · 2003 to 2007
$12.2M
NSHAP Wave II Partner Data CollectionR01AG033903 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI WAITE, LINDA J · 2009 to 2013
$5.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021487NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033903NIA NIH HHS R37 AG030481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as a "state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity." Despite general acceptance of this comprehensive definition, there has been little rigorous scientific attempt to use it to measure and assess population health. Instead, the dominant model of health is a disease-centered Medical Model (MM), which actively ignores many relevant domains. In contrast to the MM, we approach this issue through a Comprehensive Model (CM) of health consistent with the WHO definition, giving statistically equal consideration to multiple health domains, including medical, physical, psychological, functional, and sensory measures. We apply a data-driven latent class analysis (LCA) to model 54 specific health variables from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), a nationally representative sample of US community-dwelling older adults. We first apply the LCA to the MM, identifying five health classes differentiated primarily by having diabetes and hypertension. The CM identifies a broader range of six health classes, including two "emergent" classes completely obscured by the MM. We find that specific medical diagnoses (cancer and hypertension) and health behaviors (smoking) are far less important than mental health (loneliness), sensory function (hearing), mobility, and bone fractures in defining vulnerable health classes. Although the MM places two-thirds of the US population into "robust health" classes, the CM reveals that one-half belong to less healthy classes, independently associated with higher mortality. This reconceptualization has important implications for medical care delivery, preventive health practices, and resource allocation.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth StatusMental HealthQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedSensationUnited Statesagingcomprehensive healthdiseasehealth policywell-being

Identifiers

PMID27185911
PMCPMC4896706
OpenAlexW2396014933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.