Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185828›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2016

Regulatory Requirements for Staphylococcus aureus Nitric Oxide Resistance.

Melinda R Grosser, Andy Weiss, Lindsey N Shaw, Anthony R Richardson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inducible antibacterial responses in macrophages.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Quorum-sensingeLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Quorum-sensingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Macrophages inFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  16. Deleterious Effects of an Air Pollutant (NOFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Respiration and Small Colony Variants ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  20. Virulence and Metabolism.Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda R GrosserDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Andy WeissDepartment of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Lindsey N ShawDepartment of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Anthony R RichardsonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA anthony_richardson@pitt.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

The Role of Lactate in the Metabolic Evolution of Staphylococcus aureusR01AI093613 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, ANTHONY R. · 2011 to 2021
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe ability of Staphylococcus aureus to resist host innate immunity augments the severity and pervasiveness of its pathogenesis. Nitric oxide (NO˙) is an innate immune radical that is critical for the efficient clearance of a wide range of microbial pathogens. Exposure of microbes to NO˙ typically results in growth inhibition and induction of stress regulons. S. aureus, however, induces a metabolic state in response to NO˙ that allows for continued replication and precludes stress regulon induction. The regulatory factors mediating this distinctive response remain largely undefined. Here, we employ a targeted transposon screen and transcriptomics to identify and characterize five regulons essential for NO˙ resistance in S. aureus: three virulence regulons not formerly associated with NO˙ resistance, SarA, CodY, and Rot, as well as two regulons with established roles, Fur and SrrAB. We provide new insights into the contributions of Fur and SrrAB during NO˙ stress and show that the S. aureus ΔsarA mutant, the most sensitive of the newly identified mutants, exhibits metabolic dysfunction and widespread transcriptional dysregulation following NO˙ exposure. Altogether, our results broadly characterize the regulatory requirements for NO˙ resistance in S. aureus and suggest an intriguing overlap between the regulation of NO˙ resistance and virulence in this well-adapted human pathogen. IMPORTANCE: The prolific human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus is uniquely capable of resisting the antimicrobial radical nitric oxide (NO˙), a crucial component of the innate immune response. However, a complete understanding of how S. aureus regulates an effective response to NO˙ is lacking. Here, we implicate three central virulence regulators, SarA, CodY, and Rot, as major players in the S. aureus NO˙ response. Additionally, we elaborate on the contribution of two regulators, SrrAB and Fur, already known to play a crucial role in S. aureus NO˙ resistance. Our study sheds light on a unique facet of S. aureus pathogenicity and demonstrates that the transcriptional response of S. aureus to NO˙ is highly pleiotropic and intrinsically tied to metabolism and virulence regulation.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialImmunity, InnateIronIron Chelating AgentsMutationNitric OxidePeroxidesStaphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsIronIron Chelating AgentsNitric OxidePeroxides

Identifiers

PMID27185828
PMCPMC4944221
OpenAlexW2396457064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.