Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185531›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Giorgia Cona, Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi, Giuseppe Sartori, Cristina Scarpazza

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Longitudinal declines in event-based, but not time-based, prospective memory among community-dwelling older adults.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Wait a second . . . Boundary conditions on delayed responding theories of prospective memory.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Age-related changes in neural mechanisms of prospective memory.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Exercise and Prospective Memory.Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giorgia ConaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Patrizia Silvia BisiacchiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe SartoriDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Cristina ScarpazzaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remembering to execute pre-defined intentions at the appropriate time in the future is typically referred to as Prospective Memory (PM). Studies of PM showed that distinct cognitive processes underlie the execution of delayed intentions depending on whether the cue associated with such intentions is focal to ongoing activity processing or not (i.e., cue focality). The present activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis revealed several differences in brain activity as a function of focality of the PM cue. The retrieval of intention is supported mainly by left anterior prefrontal cortex (Brodmann Area, BA 10) in nonfocal tasks, and by cerebellum and ventral parietal regions in focal tasks. Furthermore, the precuneus showed increased activation during the maintenance phase of intentions compared to the retrieval phase in nonfocal tasks, whereas the inferior parietal lobule showed increased activation during the retrieval of intention compared to maintenance phase in the focal tasks. Finally, the retrieval of intention relies more on the activity in anterior cingulate cortex for nonfocal tasks, and on posterior cingulate cortex for focal tasks. Such focality-related pattern of activations suggests that prospective remembering is mediated mainly by top-down and stimulus-independent processes in nonfocal tasks, whereas by more automatic, bottom-up, processes in focal tasks.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicCerebral CortexHumansLikelihood FunctionsMental RecallNeuroimagingNeuronsPrefrontal CortexReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID27185531
PMCPMC4868976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.