Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185491›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2016

Advancing Migrant Access to Health Services in Europe (AMASE): Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study.

Ibidun Fakoya, Débora Álvarez-Del Arco, Susana Monge, Andrew J Copas, Anne-Francoise Gennotte, Alain Volny-Anne, Siri Göpel, Giota Touloumi, Maria Prins, Henrique Barros and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Ibidun FakoyaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Ibidun.fakoya@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-7607
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLCardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPublic Health England · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2011-04-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigrants form a substantial proportion of the population affected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in Europe, yet HIV prevention for this population is hindered by poor understanding of access to care and of postmigration transmission dynamics.

objectiveWe present the design and methods of the advancing Migrant Access to health Services in Europe (aMASE) study, the first European cross-cultural study focused on multiple migrant populations. It aims to identify the structural, cultural, and financial barriers to HIV prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and to determine the likely country of HIV acquisition in HIV-positive migrant populations.

methodsWe delivered 2 cross-sectional electronic surveys across 10 countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom). A clinic survey aimed to recruit up to 2000 HIV-positive patients from 57 HIV clinics in 9 countries. A unique study number linked anonymized questionnaire data to clinical records data (viral loads, CD4 cell counts, viral clades, etc). This questionnaire was developed by expert panel consensus and cognitively tested, and a pilot study was carried out in 2 countries. A Web-based community survey (n=1000) reached those living with HIV but not currently accessing HIV clinics, as well as HIV-negative migrants. It was developed in close collaboration with a community advisory group (CAG) made up of representatives from community organizations in 9 of the participating countries. The CAG played a key role in data collection by promoting the survey to higher-risk migrant groups (sub-Saharan Africans, Latin Americans, men who have sex with men, and people who inject drugs). The questionnaires have considerable content overlap, allowing for comparison. Questions cover ethnicity, migration, immigration status, HIV testing and treatment, health-seeking behavior, sexual risk, and drug use. The electronic questionnaires, which were available in 15 languages, allowed for complex routing, preventing respondents from answering irrelevant questions.

resultsIn total, we recruited 2249 participants from 57 HIV clinics as part of the clinic survey and retrieved 1637 complete responses as part of the community survey.

conclusionsThe findings will provide much-needed information for improving HIV prevention interventions and access to services for migrant communities.

Indexed as

community mobilizationHIVmigrantssurvey

Identifiers

PMID27185491
PMCPMC4886100
OpenAlexW2400443089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.