Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Differential investment in visual and olfactory brain areas reflects behavioural choices in hawk moths.

Anna Stöckl, Stanley Heinze, Alice Charalabidis, Basil El Jundi, Eric Warrant, Almut Kelber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The diversity of lepidopteran spatial orientation strategies - neuronal mechanisms and emerging challenges in a changing world.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. The evolution of lepidopteran brain morphology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-unit recordings in the stick insectFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modality-specific long-term memory enhancement inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Day-night gene expression reveals circadian geneProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna StöcklDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Stanley HeinzeDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Alice CharalabidisDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Basil El JundiDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Eric WarrantDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Almut KelberDepartment of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nervous tissue is one of the most metabolically expensive animal tissues, thus evolutionary investments that result in enlarged brain regions should also result in improved behavioural performance. Indeed, large-scale comparative studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have successfully linked differences in brain anatomy to differences in ecology and behaviour, but their precision can be limited by the detail of the anatomical measurements, or by only measuring behaviour indirectly. Therefore, detailed case studies are valuable complements to these investigations, and have provided important evidence linking brain structure to function in a range of higher-order behavioural traits, such as foraging experience or aggressive behaviour. Here, we show that differences in the size of both lower and higher-order sensory brain areas reflect differences in the relative importance of these senses in the foraging choices of hawk moths, as suggested by previous anatomical work in Lepidopterans. To this end we combined anatomical and behavioural quantifications of the relative importance of vision and olfaction in two closely related hawk moth species. We conclude that differences in sensory brain volume in these hawk moths can indeed be interpreted as differences in the importance of these senses for the animal's behaviour.

Indexed as

AnimalsDecision MakingFeeding BehaviorMothsOlfactory CortexVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID27185464
PMCPMC4869021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.