Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185299›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2016

Preclinical pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and toxicity studies required for regulatory approval of a phase I clinical trial with (111)In-CP04 in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients.

Theodosia Maina, Mark W Konijnenberg, Petra KolencPeitl, Piotr Garnuszek, Berthold A Nock, Aikaterini Kaloudi, Marko Kroselj, Katja Zaletel, Helmut Maecke, Rosalba Mansi and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiopharmaceutical formulation and preliminary clinical dosimetry of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of the FirstPharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Automated Synthesis ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Theodosia MainaMolecular Radiopharmacy, INRASTES, NCSR "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
Mark W KonijnenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra KolencPeitlDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Piotr GarnuszekRadioisotope Centre POLATOM, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock, Poland.
Berthold A NockMolecular Radiopharmacy, INRASTES, NCSR "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
Aikaterini KaloudiMolecular Radiopharmacy, INRASTES, NCSR "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
Marko KroseljDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja ZaletelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Helmut MaeckeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany.
Rosalba MansiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany.
Paola ErbaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Elisabeth von GuggenbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
Alicja Hubalewska-DydejczykDepartment of Endocrinology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Renata MikolajczakRadioisotope Centre POLATOM, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock, Poland.
Clemens DecristoforoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria. Electronic address: clemens.decristoforo@i-med.ac.at.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SINational Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" · GRInnsbruck Medical University · ATNational Centre for Nuclear Research · PLUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITErasmus MC · NLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrom a series of radiolabelled cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastrin analogues, (111)In-CP04 ((111)In-DOTA-(DGlu)6-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2) was selected for further translation as a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical towards a first-in-man study in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). A freeze-dried kit formulation for multicentre application has been developed. We herein report on biosafety, in vivo stability, biodistribution and dosimetry aspects of (111)In-CP04 in animal models, essential for the regulatory approval of the clinical trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsAcute and extended single dose toxicity of CP04 was tested in rodents, while the in vivo stability of (111)In-CP04 was assessed by HPLC analysis of mouse blood samples. The biodistribution of (111)In-CP04 prepared from a freeze-dried kit was studied in SCID mice bearing double A431-CCK2R(±) xenografts at 1, 4 and 24h pi. Further 4-h animal groups were either additionally treated with the plasma expander gelofusine or injected with (111)In-CP04 prepared by wet-labelling. Pharmacokinetics in healthy mice included the 30min, 1, 4, 24, 48 and 72h time points pi. Dosimetric calculations were based on extrapolation of mice data to humans adopting two scaling models.

resultsCP04 was well-tolerated by both mice and rats, with an LD50>178.5μg/kg body weight for mice and a NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect-level) of 89μg/kg body weight for rats. After labelling, (111)In-CP04 remained >70% intact in peripheral mouse blood at 5min pi. The uptake of (111)In-CP04 prepared from the freeze-dried kit and by wet-labelling were comparable in the A431-CCK2R(+)-xenografts (9.24±1.35%ID/g and 8.49±0.39%ID/g, respectively; P>0.05). Gelofusine-treated mice exhibited significantly reduced kidneys values (1.69±0.15%ID/g vs. 5.55±0.94%ID/g in controls, P<0.001). Dosimetry data revealed very comparable effective tumour doses for the two scaling models applied, of 0.045 and 0.044mSv/MBq.

conclusionThe present study has provided convincing toxicology, biodistribution and dosimetry data for prompt implementation of the freeze-dried kit formulation without or with gelofusine administration in a multicentre clinical trial in MTC patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleGastrinsHumansIndium RadioisotopesLethal Dose 50MaleMiceNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelRadiation DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsRatsRats, WistarGastrinsIndium RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsCCK2R-targeting of tumoursClinical translationGastrin-radioligandMedullary thyroid cancerRadionuclide therapyRadiopharmaceutical development

Identifiers

PMID27185299
PMCPMC4948680
OpenAlexW2356983239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.